Lawsuit Information Center

The California Institution for Women (CIW) in Chino is the state’s oldest women’s prison and one of its most troubled. Operated by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, CIW has long been plagued by overcrowding, inadequate medical care, and repeated allegations of sexual abuse by staff.

In recent years, former inmates have come forward describing sexual assault by correctional officers and predatory conduct during medical exams, including allegations against the prison’s longtime OB-GYN. Those revelations have led to civil sexual assault lawsuits, a federal investigation, and renewed scrutiny of how California prisons protect the women in their custody.

This page will look at civil lawsuits for sexual abuse of female prisoners at the California Institution for Women (CIW) in Chino. Inmates at CIW have been subjected to sexual abuse at the hands of correctional officers through threats and coercion. Many inmates have also been sexually abused by the prison OB-GYN during medical exams.

San Diego County’s juvenile detention system, including the former Kearny Mesa Juvenile Detention Facility, has a documented history of sexual abuse, staff misconduct, and institutional failures that left minors vulnerable while in county custody.

For decades, youth held at these facilities were tragically abused by staff members and others in positions of authority, raising serious questions about supervision, oversight, and the county’s ability to protect children it was legally responsible for safeguarding.

Kearny Mesa Juvenile Detention Facility, which operated for decades as San Diego County’s primary long-term juvenile hall, was under the control of the San Diego County Probation Department. Like other county-run juvenile facilities, it was required to meet basic constitutional standards and comply with laws designed to prevent sexual abuse, including the Prison Rape Elimination Act. Instead, internal reviews, complaints, and later investigations described an environment where reports of abuse were ignored or inadequately investigated, and where staff accused of misconduct were allowed continued access to detained youth.