Articles Posted in Mass Torts

by

The Bard PowerPort, also called a BardPort, is a port catheter device implanted just under the skin to allow easy attachment to a catheter for intravenous delivery of fluids or medications.

The Bard PowerPort has inherent design and manufacturing flaws that make the device prone to fracturing and migrating out of position. This can cause severe injuries, including internal vascular damage, blood clots, infection, sepsis, pulmonary embolism, organ injury, and the need for surgery to remove or repair the device.

Individuals who suffered injuries because of a defective Bard PowerPort device are now bringing product liability lawsuits against the manufacturer of the PowerPort implants. Our firm is currently accepting new cases from anyone who had a Bard PowerPort port catheter device implanted and was injured because of a fracture, migration, infection, thrombosis, or another implant failure.

Continue reading

by

Our lawyers are handling Similac and Enfamil infant formula lawsuits for families whose premature babies suffered or died from necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) after taking one of these formulas.  Our law firm is reviewing NEC lawsuits in all 50 states.

Medical research links cow milk-based infant formulas such as Similac and Enfamil to a dangerous neonatal medical condition known as necrotizing enterocolitis.  These newborn NEC formula lawsuits make many allegations.  But at their core, they allege that the makers of these formulas knew of the risk of NEC and did nothing to warn families and give them a choice.

If your premature baby was diagnosed with NEC after being given Similac or Enfamil formula, you may be able to participate in a class action lawsuit against the formula companies and receive financial compensation for the harm that was done to your child.

Continue reading

by

A spinal cord stimulator is an implantable medical device used to manage chronic pain, most often involving the back or spine. These systems are marketed as a way to reduce pain by interrupting nerve signals before they reach the brain. But for a growing number of patients, the device fails to help. It introduces new and sometimes permanent problems, including electrical shocks, burning pain, infections, lead migration, hardware failure, and repeat surgeries to reposition or remove equipment that was supposed to improve quality of life.

This page explains spinal cord stimulator lawsuits and why they are being filed nationwide. It focuses on what patients are alleging, how these devices have failed in real-world use, and why many of these cases go beyond ordinary medical malpractice claims. The most serious lawsuits do not center on a single surgical mistake. They examine how modern spinal cord stimulators were designed, tested, and approved, and whether patients were ever adequately warned about the risks that now recur repeatedly in medical records and FDA reports.

Many people arrive here with a practical question in mind: what do spinal cord stimulator settlement amounts look like, and how does compensation get calculated when a device causes lasting harm? That question cannot be answered in isolation. Settlement amounts and payouts are driven by the full medical timeline, including the cost of repeat surgeries, explantation, permanent loss of function, and the downstream consequences when a pain-management device leaves someone worse off than before it was implanted.

Continue reading

by

This page is for women considering filing a vaginal mesh lawsuit in 2026.

Vaginal mesh litigation has become one of the most significant mass torts in recent history, involving thousands of lawsuits against multiple manufacturers of transvaginal mesh (TVM) products.

This article provides a history of the vaginal mesh litigation and gives you the lay of the land for bringing a vaginal mesh lawsuit in 2026. Our lawyers also discuss our average settlement amounts and jury payouts for victims with successful claims.

Continue reading

by

This page examines Suboxone, its associated dental complications, and the subsequent Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits that occurred in 2025. 

What is the Suboxone lawsuit about? The lawsuit is about what Suboxone does to your teeth. The core of every Suboxone lawsuit is that the defendants knew of the risk of severe tooth decay and other dental injuries. They did not convey that risk to prescribing doctors or patients because they chose profits over people.

Unfortunately, our lawyers are no longer taking on new Suboxone cases in 2026.  

Continue reading

by

Our lawyers are investigating Ozempic lawsuits for patients with NAION, gastroparesis or gastrointestinal conditions, including bowel obstruction or cyclic vomiting syndrome.

Ozempic is the popular brand name for semaglutide, a prescription drug approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. As we all know, Ozempic is also commonly used as a weight management drug. Recent scientific studies have shown that taking Ozempic, particularly at higher doses, can cause gastroparesis.

Continue reading

by

This page is about Truvada lawsuits and other HIV drug injury lawsuits involving kidney or bone injuries.

HIV drugs containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) are, we believe, putting patients at risk. This has resulted in HIV drug lawsuits from victims alleging kidney disease and failure, bone density loss, bone injuries, and other side effects.

Viread® and Truvada® are two of the first brand-name drugs developed by Gilead Sciences to treat HIV. Viread and Truvada both use tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), a new type of antiviral drug that was one of the first effective treatments for slowing HIV.

Continue reading

by
Thousands of women who underwent internal bra breast surgery are now experiencing serious complications from the surgical mesh placed inside them, and many are pursuing legal action against the manufacturers that promoted these products for a use the FDA never approved.

Breast mesh lawsuits allege that manufacturers of products such as AlloDerm, GalaFLEX, Phasix, and AlloMax marketed their devices for breast reconstruction, augmentation, and revision surgeries even though those applications had never been adequately studied or approved by the FDA. Patients were not warned. Surgeons were not given enough information. So when complications developed, including infection, mesh failure, chronic pain, and the need for additional surgery, most women did not have the information to connect the dots from their problems to the problems with the devices.

This page explains the internal bra mesh lawsuit in plain English: what the legal claims are, who may be eligible, what complications may qualify, and what these cases may be worth.

Continue reading

by

Dupixent (dupilumab) is a biologic medication used to treat atopic dermatitis, asthma, and other inflammatory conditions. It works by targeting specific immune pathways involved in allergic inflammation. For many patients with moderate to severe eczema, Dupixent has provided relief where topical medications failed. As a result, it has become one of the most widely prescribed biologic drugs for skin and respiratory conditions.

But for a growing number of patients, the experience with Dupixent has been very different. Over the past several years, doctors and researchers have reported cases in which patients treated with Dupixent were later diagnosed with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, a rare form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that primarily affects the skin. These reports have led to increasing scrutiny of whether Dupixent can worsen, accelerate, or mask CTCL in certain patients.

In many cases our lawyers are now investigating, patients who received Dupixent for newly diagnosed eczema and developed concerning symptoms within weeks or months, including swollen lymph nodes and worsening skin disease.

Continue reading
Contact Information

Personal injury lawyers handling serious personal injury truck and auto accident, medical malpractice and products liability cases throughout the United States.

Your Privacy Choices Cookie Policy Manage Cookies

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2013 – 2026, Miller & Zois, LLC
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design