This page provides the latest news and updates on the 3M earplug lawsuits and the settlement in 2024. We continue to update this page to provide information.
We are not handling new 3M earplug lawsuits.
- New Military Claim: Camp Lejeune lawsuit
- Military housing lawsuits
- Tepezza hearing loss lawsuits: Graves’ disease treatment may cause hearing loss and tinnitus
3M Earplug Lawsuit News
February 20, 2024: Judge Rogers ordered that the deadlines set forth in the now infamous CMO #57 for the listed plaintiffs will be extended by 30 days from today. This extension is granted to allow for the correction of any incorrect opt-out decisions previously made.
Furthermore, if you are a plaintiff on the list who had a status conference scheduled within the MDL, that conference will be canceled. The court may reschedule these conferences at a future date if the necessary changes to the opt-out elections are not completed.
The plaintiffs, who are listed on an Exhibit, are given ten days from the notification by the Settlement Administrator to either their primary lawyers or to themselves if they are representing pro se, to complete and return the registration packet. Plaintiffs on the list who choose to participate in the Expedited Payment Program must also submit any additional required documents to the firm BrownGreer PLC within the same 10-day window. No supplemental documents will be accepted after this deadline.
- 30-Day Deadlines (by 2/26/2024):
- Claimants must meet production requirements detailed in sections V.A.a–c and VII.A of CMO 57.
- Claimants must comply with preservation notice requirements in sections IV & VII.A of CMO 57.
- 60-Day Deadlines (by 3/25/2024):
- Claimants are to submit expert reports as outlined in sections V.A.d & VII.A of CMO 57.
- The latest possible date for a status conference as specified in section VII.C of CMO 57.
Additionally, claimants must serve a Statute of Limitations Affidavit on Defense Counsel within 30 days of this Order, providing specific information related to their use of the CAEv2 and potential litigation.
Other deadlines from CMO 57 not associated with the election date remain unaffected by this Order. However, failure to comply with the Order’s requirements may result in dismissal of a case with prejudice.
I’m posting this because it applies to many who do not have lawyers. But this is not legal advice. I’m putting this up for… entertainment? Yeah, that is it.
Seriously, it is late at night and I’m tired. Don’t trust me. Read the orders yourself – I will try to post them tomorrow (update: I did above) – and talk to your lawyer if this applies to you.
There is a frustration in the comments that I don’t offer as many updates as I used to do. I understand this. But I really do not want to answer or address specific questions that should be going on between you and your lawyers. (Read: I don’t want to be saying one thing and your lawyer saying another… even when I am right.)
Again, if you want to talk/vent about these issues, there are many people there for you in the comments section below.
January 30, 2024: There was so much drama around the stock sale part of the settlement. Now, 3M has decided to pay $1 billion in cash, instead of using stock, as part of a $6 billion settlement over claims of defective combat earplugs. This amendment to the settlement was made a month after they received court permission to issue unregistered stock.
The change is finalized and outlined in a court order specifying a schedule for six payments. These payments will start after it’s confirmed that at least 98% of claimants have agreed to participate in the settlement, a threshold 3M expects to exceed by March 25, 2024.
Why is 3M choosing cash payments over stock? No idea. My guess is that it was a huge administrative hassle.
January 26, 2024: A law firm filed a motion to extend the registration deadline yesterday. The reason for the request is the slow mail at the Mississippi prison where the man is incarcerated (from an armed robbery conviction – he was the driver of the getaway vehicle).
The motion is accompanied by an affidavit from the man’s lawyer addressing the prison’s slow mail. The affidavit is hazy on why they got so close to the deadline in the first place.
It will be interesting to see how Judge Rodgers rules. Indeed, being incarcerated makes the process of submitting a claim more challenging. Why not just show a little grace and give this man an opportunity to submit his claim? That is how I would lean if I were the judge and Judge Rodgers has a history of doing just that in this litigation. But the court has to balance that inclination with opening the Pandora’s box of the precedent of the deadline not being the deadline in what is a very complicated settlement administratively.
January 15, 2024: Our law firm is getting more calls from 3M earplugs now than we were before the settlement. Contrary to the narrative, the claims seem as strong.
Our firm is not taking new 3M earplug cases, and we are unaware of any firms that are.
In other news, the last MDL case count is 276,568 cases.
January 8, 2024: Effective January 26, 2024, BrownGreer PLC replaces Archer Systems as Settlement Administrator for the Combat Arms Earplug MDL. BrownGreer assumes all prior responsibilities.
So upon successfully completing the transition process, Archer will be released from any further obligations or responsibilities associated with this settlement.
I have no idea of the backstory here. This is not a good look for Archer.
The settlement seems to be moving forward pretty close to schedule. The best updates are in the comments section below.
January 3, 2024: Judge Rodgers approved the plan to issue $1 billion in unregistered stock as part of its $6 billion settlement with service members over allegedly defective combat earplugs. The approval was based on the valuation methodology and other considerations supporting the fairness of using unregistered stock for payment.
The stock’s value will be determined using a weighted average method, commonly used by regulators and experienced business professionals, to ascertain fair share value for publicly traded companies. To minimize the risk of stock dilution, as the veterans’ fund sells shares, the stock will be issued in tranches. An investment manager and adviser will be employed to reduce investment risks.
January 2, 2024: The big news, I guess, is that 3M contributed $250 million to the Qualified Settlement Fund. This fund is designated to provide compensation to approximately 25,000 to 30,000 veterans who chose to accept smaller, quicker payments.
December 12, 2023: Today was the fairness hearing. One veteran, who will join the settlement, expressed apprehension that 3M might file for bankruptcy, potentially affecting a key element of the settlement that involves transferring $1 billion in stock. A former SEC commissioner expressed confidence in the fairness of the stock transfer, noting it was negotiated at arm’s length and that 3M’s status as a widely held public company provided a reliable market value for the stock.
The shares in question would be issued to a settlement fund and could be sold immediately, with provisions to mitigate the risk of stock dilution.
I think it is unlikely Rodgers will disturb this deal.
December 6, 2023: Judge Rodgers has decided not to revisit the possibility of sanctioning two Dechert LLP attorneys. Judge Rodgers had imposed sanctions of $12,000 against two attorneys for allegedly violating her order on presenting evidence during closing arguments in one of the bellwether trials.
These lawyers bill $12,000 for waking up in the morning. But they decided to make a federal case out of it, challenging the sanctions in the 11th Circuit. The appeal court overturned the sanction on technical issues – the necessary notice was not provided to the attorneys and the judge did not – even though it would seem obvious in context – formally find there was subjective bad faith by the attorneys. So the 11th Circuit kicked it back to Judge Rodgers.
But Judge Rodgers decided it was time to leave well enough alone and is dropping the whole thing.
November 28, 2023: The new 2024 VA disability rates will be effective December 1, 2023, and disabled veterans will see a new 3.2% COLA (cost of living) increase in January 2024.
This is good information relevant to many of you. It comes from one of the commenters below.
November 27, 2023: The judge had previously issued orders to create a Combat Arms Earplugs Qualified Settlement Fund (QSF) and a Combat Arms Earplugs Common Benefit Qualified Settlement Fund (CB QSF), appointing ARCHER Systems, LLC and Randall L. Sansom as co-administrators of these funds.
A new order last week has amended these previous Orders, replacing ARCHER with BrownGreer PLC as a co-administrator of the QSFs. CPA Randall L. Sansom will continue in his current role. BrownGreer is now authorized to undertake all necessary activities for managing the QSF and CB QSF, as outlined in the relevant orders. This amendment relieves ARCHER of any future duties or responsibilities related to the QSF and CB QSF.
We do know know the backstory but this is unlikely to matter much. BrownGreer has already been involved in the litigation.
November 24, 2023: This is the link to the comments section below. I think the comments have been helpful to many to get information, offer your take, and vent.
As I have said, we support the 3M earplug settlement. But we will start deleting pro-settlement comments that do not appear substantive. We are getting many posts in support of the settlement that… just do not seem real. Why would someone bother to do this? Beats me. But it is annoying because I want people to be able to access real information and opinions. So if you see some deleted posts from here on, that may be what it is.
November 19, 2023: The court issued a Deadline Registration Order on Thursday that addresses some critical deadlines related to the Combat Arms Master Settlement Agreement (MSA).
Here are the new deadlines:
- For MSA I (the first part of the agreement), the initial registration date is now January 25, 2024, and the final date is March 25, 2024.
- For MSA III (another part of the agreement), the initial date is December 20, 2023, and the final date is February 20, 2024.
November 18, 2023: 42,647 new cases were added to the 3M earplugs MDL over the last 30 days.
We have been writing these “this many cases have been brought” updates for years. We should have provided more context when this was originally posted on Friday. The settlement closed out long ago. This is not a bunch of people jumping into the settlement after the fact. This is just the updated accounting.
November 17, 2023: The Fairness Hearing is scheduled for 10:00 a.m. EST on December 11, 2023.
November 7, 2023: Judge Rodgers has further streamlined the 3M earplug MDL by dismissing numerous duplicate claims after the October 11 deadline to resolve these issues passed. This action follows her directive that claimants with unresolved duplications would default to representation by the firm that filed the earliest suit, and any additional filings would be dismissed with prejudice. A total of 3,548 unresolved claims were identified, leading to a significant reduction in case numbers, with only the initial filings for each claimant being maintained.
October 30, 2023: Judge Rogers issued an order for two groups of plaintiffs. One group is being given one last chance to provide accurate email addresses and cell phone numbers by November 3, 2023. If they don’t, their cases will be dismissed due to repeated non-compliance with the Court’s orders
Claimants on a second list had their cases previously dismissed for various reasons. The only action left is to close their PIDs in MDL-Centrality, which the Settlement Data Administrator is directed to do by this order.
These are short lists. Eight plaintiffs are on the first list and 39 are on the second list.
October 17, 2023: Scammers have set their sights on claimants participating in the $6 billion settlement related to allegations of hearing damage caused by 3M combat earplugs. Judge Rodgers issued a stark warning after discovering that fraudulent actors were impersonating employees of Archer Systems LLC, the company designated to administer the settlement. These imposters have been initiating unsolicited cold calls to claimants, attempting to extract sensitive personal information, including social security numbers and dates of birth. Judge Rodgers unequivocally declared these calls as scams and promptly alerted the Federal Bureau of Investigation to the attempted fraud and identity theft. She emphasized the need for claimants to exercise extreme vigilance in safeguarding their sensitive data from potential scammers.
The order issued by Judge Rodgers advises individuals contacted by scammers to promptly reach out to the plaintiffs’ counsel, who will work to counteract these fraudulent activities and report them to the appropriate authorities.
October 11, 2023: A federal judge warned lawyers representing military veterans and service members about potential penalties for continuing to make repetitive claims and filings. Such actions, the judge emphasized, waste valuable court resources. If this persists, penalties for “willful and repeated violation” of case management directives will be imposed. “This stops now,” U.S. Magistrate Judge Hope Cannon demands in her order.
October 10, 2023: The big question is what percentage of people will take the expedited settlement. Because that will make a big difference in how the money is allocated. The estimates I have heard range between 70% and 90%. Reading our comments section below, you would not think this is a realistic prediction. But our comments section is not reflective of the population of plaintiffs. Our commenters are more interested in the litigation because they generally have better claims. So we will see how it flushes out.
October 5, 2023: Let’s return to the “When Will I Get Paid under the Expedited Program?” conversation…
The short answer is we do not know. According to Archer, although the precise payment dates for individual claimants remain uncertain, it’s possible that some expedited payments could be issued as early as December 2023. According to Archer’s report, approximately half of the claimants enrolled in the expedited settlement program are expected to receive their compensation by the conclusion of 2024. Archer estimates that all claimants participating in the expedited payment program will have received their payouts by May 30, 2025.
You would not want to bet your life on any of this. But this is the best estimate. You have to think/hope that Archer has done this enough to know that you want to underpromise and overdeliver on these estimations.
October 3, 2023: I always told my sisters -jokingly, I think – that if they killed one of our parents, I would not talk to them for at least 20 years. But, in the meantime, I would help them hide the body. Why? Because what’s done is done.
We recommend the settlement to our clients. Why? First, we must recommend the settlement to 100% of all eligible claimants (according to my read of MSA section 8.1.2).
You might want to stop reading now because if you think what comes next has no credibility. I get that. But I’m not required to put myself out there and give an opinion online.
I do not think opting out is a viable option if your goal is to get as much money as you can from this. Many veterans are looking for a lawyer to come in and take opt-out cases on a contingency and I have yet to hear of a single lawyer willing to do that. No one in the 3,000 comments below has named a law firm that will, and it has been a great source of discussion (and some yeoman efforts by some of the commentators that are very admirable).
It is not unreasonable to be angry about the settlement. I get it, I really do. Certainly, the numbers cannot be said to be full justice for victims. I’ve said I would rather not have tinnitus than have $1 million. Whether this settlement should have been agreed to – which you have to understand is a different question – is a debate that has and will continue to rage on in the comments below. There are reasonable people on both sides of this.
But the bigger question is what should you do now for yourself and your family. Because what’s done is done. We are where we are. I think the settlement is the only path here.
(This is my general opinion and is not, of course, legal advice to you. Talk to your lawyer about your specific case.)
October 2, 2023: Many of the questions plaintiffs are asking is how the point system works and when payments will be made.
The point system has not been publicized. But here is what we have gotten for the expedited payment – with likely payouts next year:
- Tinnitus Only: $5,000. This is for tinnitus where there are no contemporaneous records to corroborate or confirm without compensable hearing loss.
- Recorded Tinnitus: $10,000. The tinnitus payment is doubled if there is a diagnosis of tinnitus or the plaintiff sought treatment for symptoms within two years of the last use of earplugs.
- Slight Hearing Loss: $10,000. This is defined as 15 db Hearing Loss in a least one testing frequency.
- Mild Hearing Loss: $16,000. Defined as a least 20 db but no more than 35 db Hearing Loss in at least one testing frequency.
- Moderate or Greater Hearing Loss: $24,000 This is defined as 40db or more hearing loss at least one testing frequency.
If you meet the criteria for multiple categories and opt for the expedited payment program, the values of each category are not combined. Instead, you will receive the higher of the two award amounts. For instance, if you have both documented tinnitus and moderate hearing loss, you will be eligible for $24,000, not $34,000.
For the full evaluation program, the payout schedule will be put out in the future:
October 1, 2025
October 1, 2026
October 1, 2027
October 1, 2028
October 1, 2029
As for which settlement option is best for you, I have opinions about what I think the vast majority of people should do. But I think that is a discussion you should have with your lawyer. I believe the lion’s share of people will take the expedited payment option not because it is the best thing for them but because they want money now as opposed to money later.
September 28, 2023: Many people suggest in the comments that they have lawyers willing to tackle the draconian requirements of CMO #57. No one has yet to name a lawyer who has said I’m ready to take opt-out cases for plaintiffs who are not now my clients.
Let’s all be transparent. If you have talked to a lawyer who wants to handle 3M earplug opt-out cases, do everyone a favor and name them in the comments. If these lawyers are looking for cases, they will be grateful for the free advertising. Otherwise, I fear we are misleading people into thinking there is this pack of lawyers out there ready to jump in if they can only just find them.
I don’t think there is a viable path to a greater recovery by opting out of the settlement.
September 26, 2023: Wave cases will get higher settlements, so many people want to know if they had a Wave case. You would know you had a Wave case if you had a Wave case. They involved a great deal of case-specific discovery with deposition, etc.
By the way, the comment section was shut down for a few hours today. Sorry for the inconvenience. (But I can’t believe the comments suggesting I shut the page down for questioning the settlement. Y’all should know me by now.)
September 23, 2023: Judge Rodgers issued CMO #68 out of frustration that the Identification Order Declarations are missing important information, like social security numbers and birth dates. So this violates CMO #60, and the Judge is mad.
The court’s order requires people submitting incomplete or wrong documents and their lawyers to fix the information. They need to do this by Monday, September 25, 2023. If they don’t fix it by then, their claims will be thrown out, apparently without further warning.
September 22, 2023: Judge Rodgers issued CMO #69, which addresses changes in the requirements and deadlines for submitting certain documents related to a legal case. Initially, there were specific rules ( Pretrial Order Nos. 18 and 81 and Case Management Order No. 40) that outlined when and how people involved in the case needed to provide information, including military records and personal details.
But we have the settlement now, so this new order replaces the old rules and deadlines. The critical change is that accurate and complete information must be provided promptly to avoid issues.
Here are the new deadlines:
- Individuals who had claims on the court’s docket by August 29, 2023, and were subject to a census form deadline at that time must submit accurate and complete census forms through MDL Centrality by Thursday, October 5, 2023. The court lists the names of all of the 1,736 people this applies, and I’m sure Archer will put this online at some point, but I’m not putting people’s names online.
- All other eligible claimants must submit accurate and complete census and DD214 forms through MDL Centrality within 14 days after their claim was identified on an Identification Order Declaration but no later than September 26, 2023.
Additionally, a deficiency process is in place for incomplete or incorrect submissions. If your census forms or Plaintiff Fact Sheets have deficiencies, you’ll receive notice and must correct the deficiencies within 14 days.
The tone is harsh. The court points out that the Settlement Data Administrator has the authority to handle these documents and deficiencies. If you fail to meet the requirements and deadlines, your case may be dismissed without a show cause order or any further notice.
September 20, 2023: One source of frustration among veterans is that 3M will not admit responsibility in this settlement.
An admission of guilt was never on the table. Admitting responsibility would open the door for everyone to opt-out and move forward on that admission. Maybe it would be admissible at trial, maybe it would not, but it would be, at a minimum, a sword plaintiffs would hammer 3M with over and over. Admitting guilt would also be harmful to 3 M’s reputation. They have long vigorously denied responsibility – have you ever read what they told shareholders throughout this litigation? – so the optics would be terrible.
And it is not just 3M. You do not see defendants fall on their swords in mass tort settlements.
September 18, 2023: As of this week, the total number of plaintiffs with active cases in the 3M earplug MDL is 242,604. That is 12,000 less than the number of pending cases just three months ago. Why? This actually has nothing to do with the recent settlement deal that won’t start to impact the pending case count for a long time. The recent reduction is attributable to dismissals as part of Judge Rogers’ docket control efforts.
September 13, 2023: I’m still confused by the details and logistics of how this settlement will work. Honestly, I thought it was me. But I keep talking to people “in the know” who have the same questions I have.
We must wait and see how things develop for many of these questions.
September 10, 2023: With much thought, I opened this page for comments a month ago. The best thing we have done here. We are getting so much insight into what people think and real facts about what is happening with your case and what your lawyers are telling you. This helps everyone, and I should have done it five years ago.
September 9, 2023: The hearing yesterday was noneventful, a point underscored in the comments by the many who attended. There is still not a points system in place. But we also need to know how many people will jump into the first settlement bucket before we know how much money is being spread around.
The one good thing about this deal is there is no clawback provision. In a mass tort settlement, a clawback provision is a contractual mechanism in the settlement agreement that allows the settlement administrator to recover unused funds. In this case, that money would have been returned to 3M.
But in this settlement, the whole $6.05 billion will be distributed, and the money earmarked for people who do not participate or those who take the quicker settlement, all the rest of the money goes to the remaining plaintiffs. That is not how every mass tort settlement works. But until we know the answer to that question, we do not know how much money is in the pool to be distributed using that points system.
Here is a link to the video of the hearing. A very rare video of federal court proceedings.
September 5, 2023: I used to think I was good at making predictions in mass tort cases. I read so many things wrong in this litigation.
I did not think the non-military Minnesota lawsuit would fall into this settlement. I was wrong on that, too.
Judge Rodgers’s new order loops these cases into the settlement per the settlement agreement. Her order modifies Case Management Order No. 62 (ECF No. 3827) by broadening the scope of Minnesota cases eligible for inclusion in the Administrative Docket within the MDL until October 2, 2023. So any Minnesota case filed and/or served by August 29, 2023, can now be added to the MDL’s Administrative Docket.
September 4, 2023: We have been throwing around this $8,333.33 quick settlement idea, which we derived from doing the math in the settlement agreement. It may be that those quick and easy settlements will come in tiers based on the level of injury, according to what some are speculating. Our source is our comments section below (it may not work on cell phones). When it gets flushed out for certain, we will let you know.
We will remain committed to telling you what we know, when we know it until this thing is finally done. Have a happy Labor Day!
September 1, 2023: There will be a Case Management Conference on Friday, September 8, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. (CDT) before Judge Rodgers to discuss the 3M earplug settlement program.
August 31, 2023: Bloomberg had an article yesterday about the possibility of the opt-outs tanking the 3M earplug settlement. This does not appear to be a big concern for most people I have spoken to about the settlement. But you might develop a different take reading the comments to this post.
I think the best claims will see more money than people expect in the comments. First, many quickie settlements will change the average settlement for those who opt-in but submit to the settlement points system.
You are also likely to see many veterans not following through with the necessary paperwork to claim their settlement. The crazy thing – to me, anyway – is that so much of the process – besides the discussion of the decision to opt in – will not be done by the lawyers but by the administrators.
Why does this matter? Many of the plaintiffs in this litigation are not responsive to their lawyers. Will they respond better to an administrator, which may sound like a sales call? I think you will see many victims not participating, which will raise settlement amounts for everyone else. If you add a lot of zeroes to the average, it raises the average for everyone else.
Ultimately, this is America, and we get to make choices, thanks in no small part to the plaintiffs in the litigation. Everyone will have to make individual choices about what they want to do. The key will be working with your lawyer and understanding all the pros and cons. My guess is that when the smoke clears, many veterans – more than 98% and with a lot of bitterness – will determine that participating in the settlement is in their best interests.
In the coming weeks, we should know which way the wind is blowing.
August 30, 2023: Interestingly, veterans groups are on board. The Enlisted Association of the National Guard of the United States represents 5.5 million veterans, and the Military Order of the Purple Heart, which advocates for more than 45,000 wounded vets, are vocally supporting the deal.
Note: This is what Bloomberg is reporting. In the comments below, someone disagreed:
Just spoke to my rep at the Military Order of the Purple Heart (703)-642-5360 , they’re saying that the statement “Military Order of the Purple Heart, which advocates for more than 45,000 wounded vets, are vocally supporting the deal.” is completely incorrect and inaccurate.
August 29, 2023: Earlier this morning, 3M issued a formal press release and submitted a disclosure statement to the Securities and Exchange Commission confirming the general terms of the recent earplugs settlement agreement. 3M will pay a total of $6 billion into a settlement fund, and over the next several years, that fund will be used to pay claims. The SEC filing confirmed that 3 M’s board of directors has formally approved the settlement.
Let’s look at some of the deal terms. I’m doing this quickly so that I may get some of this wrong. Correct me in the comments below if you think I have it wrong. For legal advice, you really need to speak to your own lawyer.
- 3M can walk away at any time if there is not a 98% – 98%! – participation rate. 3M is unlikely to stick to that number. But goodness, it is aggressive.
- For $8,333.33 (before fees and costs), you can probably settle your case as early as this year. 3M wants to pay this money out early because it really wants to bait plaintiffs to take the quick money to reduce the claim count. This is not the average settlement. People in the comments are getting this wrong. It is just for those who want to get out before submitting their records and such.
- There will be a Settlement Administrator whose job is to make sure that any Registered Claimant’s medical debts (“qualified healthcare liens”) are sorted out before they get any money from the settlement. So before anyone with a registered claim gets their settlement money, this Administrator checks that all the medical debts linked to their claim are either already paid or will be paid soon.
- Once you fill out and submit a Registration Form to be part of the settlement, you can’t change your mind or take it back. This means no person who has registered can, for any reason, try to cancel their form, ask to get their Release or official dismissal document back, or leave the settlement unless the Defendants agree. But…if the Defendants decide to back out (or “Walkaway”), the Settlement Administrator will toss all the releases. There are some exceptions: the documents from the Verdicts Settlement and the Waves Settlement (unless the Defendants back out from that too). 3M also can’t back out of the $8,333,33 settlements (nor would they want to do so).
- John Perry is the special master for the settlement.
- The plaintiffs who do not opt into the quick settlement of $8,333.33 but want to settle can go into a not yet disclosed points system process. This is not a part of the settlement but something plaintiffs will set up with the special master.
August 28, 2023: Bloomberg has another article on the 3M earplug settlement this morning that is mostly a rehash of yesterday’s article with more background facts on the litigation.
3M shares are up nearly 5% at last check at 2:00 p.m. today on the news of the “tentative settlement.”
Reuters reports that a “person familiar with the proposal” says 3 M’s board of directors is poised to vote on the settlement proposal.
There is a new Bloomberg article – Bloomberg is the only one really on this – that has this money quote:
“There’s still much unknown about the 3M settlement. Even once a deal is finalized, it will still need to clear a number of legal hurdles, including sufficient buy-in from the plaintiffs. It’s not immediately clear why a majority of plaintiffs would both accept $5.5 billion and allow 3M to pay out the funds under a more generous timeline when Wall Street has broadly coalesced around a $10 billion number — or worse. 3 M’s endeavors in bankruptcy court can’t have endeared it to the other side, and one might ask, if there was a path toward a settlement at roughly half the price analysts were estimating, why did the company even bother with such a contentious maneuver in the first place?”
But, again, we need to see the overall deal before jumping to conclusions.
Our law firm is no longer taking new 3M earplug claims. Will this stop us from updating you on the latest news like we always have? Of course not.
As for the comments below, we are a little confused about whether you can access the comments on a mobile device. But you can certainly see them on a desktop. We cannot answer them all, but we are reading your comments with great interest.
August 27, 2023: Bloomberg News reports today that 3M Co. is reportedly in the final stages of settling the 3M earplug lawsuits. Forbes also has an article report on Bloomberg’s article.
That a settlement is close is not news. We have been telling you this for weeks. What is news is the number: around $5.5 billion.
Possible Settlement Structure
We think there will be a single-amount settlement offer for plaintiffs who do not have solid claims and just want to accept a low settlement amount and other claims that will be settled with a deep dive into the medical records and the specific injuries. But this is just speculation.
Little More Speculation
One more bit of speculation… everyone seems to be wondering what 3M will do with their case. It may not be on 3M. 3M may offload the responsibility to plaintiffs’ lawyers, which would be a points system (with an appeals process). Again, we have no idea how a 3M earplug settlement would be structured.
Tell Us What You Think
We will tell you more as we learn more. We will keep updating you here long after this settlement is official.
People are already commenting on the settlement news in the comments, so please jump in if you have something you want to say.
August 24, 2023: We have not mentioned the possible 3M earplug settlement in a while, so here are our latest thoughts.
The conventional wisdom is that these claims will settle sooner rather than later. We have had high hopes of a resolution before that quickly fizzled. But they have never been this high. One canary in the coal mine to watch for – the number of law firms that are no longer taking new cases. This may start happening sooner rather than later.
A settlement could take a lot of different forms, and there is very little information swirling about how a settlement might be structured… or what the average settlement might be. We have tossed around a $50,000 number as a potential mark. That is probably overly optimistic. But weaker cases pull the average down. The bigger question is what will be the average settlement in cases with cases with severe and well-documented injuries.
August 22, 2023: In three orders today, Judge Rodgers dismissed 3M claims where the plaintiffs did not submit the paperwork required to maintain a claim.
August 16, 2023: The latest case count in the MDL is 259,385. New cases are still being filed and dismissed, keeping the total number of cases relatively steady. Judge Rodgers dismissed more cases yesterday, so the actual number is slightly lower.
Note: We reopened the comments section two weeks ago if you want to offer your opinion on this litigation or hear the thoughts of other plaintiffs in the 152 comments we have. There may be a brief delay in having your comment posted, but after your first comment, we make you a “trusted user” whose comments post immediately. We answer many of your questions, but we cannot answer every question, and many questions – most notably the “when?” and “how much?” for settlement – are still unanswerable at this point.
August 15, 2023: More dismissals are set for plaintiffs who failed to submit DD214s. Meanwhile, settlement rumors continue to swirl. Are these rumors credible? Who knows?
August 2, 2023: Judge Rogers has given a group of over 350 delinquent plaintiffs in the 3M earplugs MDL yet another chance to keep their cases alive. The group of plaintiffs includes 141 who were facing dismissal based on their failure to submit the required military service documentation and another 240 who failed to submit their plaintiff census forms. Despite the fact that these plaintiffs have been given all sorts of time and extensions, Judge Rogers balked at dismissing their cases. Instead, she issued an Order stating that the plaintiffs on the list will have their cases dismissed if they fail to submit the required documents by August 3, 2023.
- Get more 3M earplug updates