Lawsuit Information Center
If you have a personal injury case in Wisconsin, it is natural to speculate on how much money you might get out of it. That is true whether your case involves a car accident, truck accident, slip and fall, dog bite, medical malpractice, nursing home injury, sexual abuse, defective product, or wrongful death.
But looking at average settlement and verdict data can be misleading because each individual case is unique. The best way to get an idea of what type of payout you can possibly expect is to look at compensation awarded in prior cases with similar facts.
Does that give you the exact answer? Of course not. You can have what appear to be two identical cases and get very different outcomes. A case with a fractured leg in Milwaukee may settle differently from a similar fractured leg case in a rural county. A case with $100,000 in medical bills may be worth far more if liability is clear and the defendant has a large commercial insurance policy. The same injury may be worth less if the jury thinks the plaintiff is partly at fault or exaggerating symptoms.
Still, there is no question that seeing settlement amounts and jury payouts in other Wisconsin cases informs your thinking on the range of values your case might bring.
Below are summaries of verdicts and reported settlements in recent personal injury cases in Wisconsin. While there is no guarantee that you will get a comparable payout from your case, these verdicts and settlements give you a better idea, within a range, of what is likely and possible.
If you were hurt in Wisconsin and want to understand the possible value of your claim, call us at 800-553-8082 or get a free online consultation.
What Drives the Settlement Value of Wisconsin Injury Lawsuits?
The settlement amounts in Wisconsin personal injury cases depend on multiple factors, including the specifics of the incident, the severity of injuries, and the state’s legal framework. No single factor controls every case. But four issues usually drive the conversation: severity of injuries, liability, insurance coverage, and the strength of the evidence.
Severity of Injuries
Assuming the defendant is responsible, the ceiling of a case starts with the extent and permanence of injuries. They are the biggest drivers of settlement value. If our lawyers can tell a jury that the victim will suffer forever, that is a powerful driver of settlement.
Cases involving catastrophic or permanent injuries, such as paralysis, traumatic brain injuries, severe burns, amputations, spinal cord injuries, brain damage, or permanent disability, will produce higher settlement payouts (all things being equal) because the damages do not end with the first hospital bill. These cases often involve future medical care, lost earning capacity, home care, equipment, and years of pain and limitation.
Minor or temporary injuries usually lead to smaller bodily injury settlements per person. You can still get strong personal injury settlement results in non-permanent injury cases, but the hill is steeper. Soft tissue injuries, short treatment periods, modest medical bills, and no permanent impairment give the insurance company more room to argue for a lower number.
Clear Liability
This is the threshold question. If you cannot win the case, you are not going to get a good settlement.
When the defendant’s negligence is undisputed, settlements will usually be higher. Clear liability reduces the need for prolonged legal disputes because all that is left is determining case value. This is mostly what our law firm handles in car accident claims. In many strong accident cases, there are few real liability disputes.
A rear-end crash with a sober defendant who admits fault is one case. A disputed intersection crash where each driver says the other ran the red light is another. The injuries may be similar. The value may not be.
Insurance Coverage Limits
In most cases, the defendant’s insurance policy limits act as a practical cap on settlement amounts, especially in auto accident cases. Wisconsin law requires minimum motor vehicle liability coverage of $25,000 per person, $50,000 per accident for bodily injury, and $10,000 for property damage. Wisconsin also requires uninsured motorist coverage of $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident.
Those minimum limits are low. If someone causes a crash that results in surgery, brain injury, or permanent disability, a $25,000 policy is not remotely enough. In those cases, the other paths to a higher payout may include umbrella coverage, commercial coverage, employer liability, product claims, negligent entrustment claims, dram shop claims if available under another state’s law, or uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage.
Corporate cases are different. A trucking company, hospital, nursing home chain, product manufacturer, construction company, or large property owner may have far more coverage and assets than an ordinary driver.
Strength of Evidence
The strength and reliability of evidence directly influence bodily injury settlement amounts. Strong witness testimony, comprehensive medical documentation, photographs, video, expert reports, and treating doctor opinions enhance a claim’s credibility.
Good evidence does two things. It proves what happened, and it makes the insurance company afraid of what a jury may do. A case with crash photos, surveillance video, clean medical records, no treatment gaps, clear imaging, and a treating doctor who connects the injury to the accident has more settlement leverage than a case built on vague pain complaints and missing documentation.
Detailed records of damages, including medical costs, lost wages, future care, and non-economic damages, help maximize per-person settlement amounts by showing the full impact of the injury.
Venue
Another factor particularly relevant in Wisconsin is venue. Venue refers to the court or county where the case is filed. This affects value because the venue is where any potential jury will be pulled from.
In Wisconsin, the urban areas around Milwaukee, Madison, and Green Bay are generally better venues for personal injury cases than many smaller rural counties. This does not mean you cannot win in a conservative venue. You can. A good case is a good case anywhere. But venue changes settlement pressure because insurance companies study jury tendencies closely.
| Value Factor | How It Changes the Claim | Insurance Company Response |
|---|---|---|
| Permanent Injury | A permanent injury increases future medical care, lost earning capacity, pain, and loss of normal life. | Raises settlement pressure |
| Clear Fault | When liability is obvious, the dispute shifts to damages instead of whether the plaintiff can win. | Usually raises value |
| Comparative Fault | Wisconsin reduces damages by the plaintiff’s percentage of fault and can bar recovery if the plaintiff is more at fault than the defendant. | Often used to discount the case |
| Objective Medical Proof | Fractures, surgery, MRI findings, scars, hardware, and specialist opinions make the injury harder to minimize. | Raises value |
| Low Insurance Limits | A strong case can still be trapped by a small policy unless other coverage or defendants exist. | May cap recovery |
| Venue | The county where the case is tried can influence settlement value because jury pools differ. | Changes trial risk |
Wisconsin Personal Injury Verdicts and Settlements
The example settlement amounts and jury payouts below offer a glimpse into how settlement compensation is evaluated in Wisconsin personal injury and medical malpractice cases. These cases highlight the factors discussed above, including injury severity, liability, venue, and insurance coverage.
No two cases are the same. Settlement compensation can vary widely depending on the unique details of your situation, the evidence available, the credibility of the parties, and how the case unfolds. These examples provide helpful context, but they are not a roadmap that predicts exactly what your case will be worth.
2026, Wisconsin: $5,500,000 Verdict
A 46-year-old truck driver suffered a traumatic head injury after falling metal pallets struck him during forklift operations at a Menards distribution center in Eau Claire. The plaintiff sustained a severe head laceration requiring emergency surgery and was left with permanent injuries.
He alleged Menards failed to properly train, certify, and supervise a temporary forklift operator and ignored known safety violations and prior similar incidents. Menards denied liability and argued that other parties were responsible. An Eau Claire County jury found Menards 100 percent at fault and awarded the plaintiff $5.5 million.
This is a good example of how a workplace injury can become a high-value third-party case if you can find someone other than your employer to blame. Workers’ compensation may cover part of the injury, but when another company or negligent actor outside the direct employer relationship is responsible, the injured worker may have a separate personal injury lawsuit.
2025, Wisconsin: $29,070,051 Verdict
A St. Croix County jury awarded more than $29 million to a family whose child developed cerebral palsy after a certified nurse midwife allegedly failed to respond properly to fetal heart rate deterioration. The plaintiffs alleged the baby was in distress and that the midwife failed to contact the on-call OB/GYN soon enough.
The verdict reportedly included a large award for future care expenses, along with damages for pain, suffering, disability, disfigurement, and loss of society and companionship. This was reported as the largest verdict in St. Croix County history.
This verdict shows why birth injury and medical malpractice cases can produce very large numbers when the child has a permanent brain injury and lifelong care needs.
2025, Wisconsin: $10,200,000 Plus Verdict
A Racine County jury awarded more than $10.2 million in a birth injury malpractice case involving allegations that negligent use of Pitocin during labor caused a child to suffer severe and permanent injury at birth. The child reportedly suffered brain damage and was later diagnosed with cerebral palsy.
This case belongs on this page because it illustrates both the value and difficulty of Wisconsin medical malpractice cases. These claims are expensive, expert-driven, and heavily defended. When the plaintiff proves negligence and catastrophic injury, the verdict can be substantial.
2023, Wisconsin: $34,500 Settlement
The plaintiff claimed that he was driving his vehicle near an intersection when he was negligently struck by the defendant. He alleged soft tissue injuries to his neck and back, and the case settled for $34,500.
This is a more modest Wisconsin car accident result. It reflects the reality that soft tissue cases can have value, but insurers usually fight them hard unless there is strong medical documentation, clear liability, and a credible treatment history.
2023, Wisconsin: $25,000 Settlement
The plaintiff was injured when the elevator she was riding in malfunctioned and suddenly dropped seven floors. She filed a premises liability lawsuit against the property owner for failing to properly maintain the elevator.
The number is modest for a frightening event. That usually suggests limited injuries, causation issues, disputed liability, insurance constraints, or some combination of these factors.
2022, Wisconsin: $175,000 Settlement
The plaintiff, an 8-year-old boy, was attacked by the defendant’s pit bull while walking to the school bus near his home. The dog repeatedly bit him on his upper right thigh and left foot, and violently thrashed its leg in its mouth. The plaintiff suffered bite marks on his leg and thigh that resulted in scarring, as well as PTSD.
Wisconsin has a strong dog owner liability statute. Under Wisconsin Statute 174.02, dog owners are generally liable for damages caused by their dog injuring a person, subject to comparative fault.
2021, Wisconsin: $1,250,000 Verdict
A head-on collision on U.S. Highway 114 resulted in severe injuries to one driver and the death of the other. The plaintiff was driving westbound when the eastbound driver crossed into her lane. Both vehicles sustained disabling damage, and the at-fault driver was killed in the crash.
The plaintiff suffered extensive injuries, including fractures to her tibia, fibula, femur, humerus, ribs, wrist, and foot. She required multiple surgeries and hardware implants. The jury awarded $1.25 million to compensate for her injuries, medical costs, and the impact of the crash.
That sounds like a lot of money, but her medical expenses reportedly totaled $931,883.38. When the medical bills approach $1 million, a seven-figure verdict may still leave the plaintiff feeling that the human loss was undervalued.
2021, Wisconsin: $155,712 Verdict
A motorcyclist collided with the vehicle in front of him. He suffered multiple left metatarsal fractures and was left permanently impaired. He alleged negligence against the at-fault driver and claimed she negligently cut him off. He received a $155,712 verdict.
2021, Wisconsin: $100,000 Settlement
A minor passenger was T boned. She injured her head and face and developed post-concussion syndrome. Her mother alleged negligence against the at-fault driver, claiming the driver failed to yield the right of way and made a negligent left turn. The case settled for $100,000.
2020, Wisconsin: $75,000 Settlement
A man slipped and fell on ice outside of a warehouse. He suffered personal injuries and alleged negligence against the property owners. He claimed they failed to maintain safe premises and remove snow from the property. The case settled for $75,000.
2020, Wisconsin: $45,000 Verdict
A minor sustained a bloody nose, facial bruising, abrasions, bite marks, and head injuries while at a daycare. His parents alleged negligence against the daycare, claiming staff provided negligent supervision and failed to address their son’s well-being. A Milwaukee County jury awarded $45,000.
2020, Wisconsin: $700,000 Settlement
A 27-year-old laborer loaded concrete forms onto an 18-wheeler’s flatbed trailer. His left leg fell down a hole in the trailer bed’s floorboard and became stuck between a tire. His body began twisting and swinging backward. He struck his head and back and suffered an L4-5 bulge. He underwent a fusion and conservative treatments and could no longer work as a laborer.
He alleged negligence against the truck driver, claiming the driver failed to warn of the hazard and repair the trailer. The case settled for $700,000.
2020, Wisconsin: $55,000 Verdict
A girl was bitten by a dog at a Petco. She suffered facial punctures and wounds and was treated by a plastic surgeon. She required scar revisions. The girl’s family alleged negligence against the dog’s owner, claiming she failed to restrain her dog and keep it on a leash. A Milwaukee County jury awarded $55,000.
2020, Wisconsin: $300,000 Settlement
A minor pedestrian was struck at a Milwaukee intersection. She suffered a traumatic brain injury, fractured left tibia, fractured left fibula, fractured right femur, nasomaxillary fracture, pelvic fracture, lip laceration, road rash, facial trauma, and multiple contusions.
The girl’s family alleged negligence against the at-fault driver, claiming he failed to maintain an appropriate lookout and yield to a pedestrian. The case settled for $300,000.
2019, Wisconsin: $14,490,000 Verdict
A man underwent a cervical CT scan. The radiologist interpreted it as normal. The man eventually became paraplegic. He alleged negligence against the radiologist, claiming the doctor failed to correctly interpret the CT scan, order additional tests, and timely treat his condition. A Milwaukee County jury awarded $14,490,000.
2019, Wisconsin: $22,500,000 Settlement
A boy underwent tethered cord surgery and received general anesthesia. He suffered hypoxia and developed permanent brain damage. The boy required lifelong care. His parents alleged negligence against the anesthesiologist, claiming excessive amounts of anesthetics and sedatives were administered and that the anesthesiologist failed to timely react to prolonged hypotension and failed to frequently read the boy’s blood pressure. The case settled for $22,500,000.
2018, Wisconsin: $1,850,000 Verdict
A newborn boy suffered argininosuccinic aciduria at birth and developed permanent brain damage. He was left with physical disabilities. His family alleged negligence against the hospital, claiming staff prematurely discharged him, failed to timely test him, failed to appreciate symptoms, and failed to order follow-up tests. The jury awarded $1,850,000.
What Is the Average Car Accident Settlement in Wisconsin?
The average car accident settlement in Wisconsin tends to be slightly lower than in some other states, largely due to population density, insurance limits, medical costs, and local jury tendencies. It is difficult to pinpoint an exact average because settlements depend on the facts of each case.
For minor to moderate injury car accident cases, many Wisconsin settlements fall somewhere in the $15,000 to $75,000 range. Severe injury cases can be worth much more, especially when the plaintiff has surgery, permanent impairment, traumatic brain injury, fractures, disfigurement, or lost earning capacity.
The biggest constraint in many Wisconsin car accident cases is insurance. Wisconsin’s minimum liability limits are only $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident for bodily injury. That is not enough for a serious crash. If the defendant has only minimum coverage, the case may be limited unless the plaintiff has uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage, the defendant has personal assets, or another defendant with deeper coverage can be brought into the case.
Wisconsin Personal Injury Law
The settlement value of a Wisconsin personal injury case is not just about injuries and verdict examples. Wisconsin law controls deadlines, comparative fault, damage caps, medical malpractice claims, wrongful death claims, government claims, and other rules that can change the value or viability of a case.
Wisconsin Personal Injury Statute of Limitations
“The statute of limitations for most Wisconsin personal injury tort claims is three years under Wis. Stat. § 893.54(1). But confusingly, car accident claims, including wrongful death arising from motor vehicle accidents, generally have a shorter two-year deadline under Wis. Stat. § 893.54(2).”
That two-year deadline can surprise families. A car or truck crash needs to be investigated quickly, not only because of the deadline but also because vehicle data, scene evidence, witness memory, and insurance information can disappear.
Wrongful Death Deadline in Wisconsin
Most Wisconsin wrongful death claims must be filed within three years. But Wisconsin has a shorter two-year deadline for wrongful death claims arising from motor vehicle accidents.
Medical Malpractice Deadline in Wisconsin
Medical malpractice lawsuits in Wisconsin must generally be filed within three years of the alleged malpractice or within one year of when the plaintiff discovered or should have discovered the injury. Wisconsin also has a five-year repose period that can bar claims regardless of discovery, with limited exceptions.
Medical malpractice deadlines are dangerous because patients often discover the malpractice later than the injury. The fact that you did not know the doctor made a mistake does not always mean the deadline is extended.
Claims Against Government Defendants
Claims against Wisconsin governmental bodies, officers, agents, or employees have special notice requirements. Wisconsin Statute 893.80 generally requires notice of the circumstances of the claim within 120 days after the event giving rise to the claim, subject to statutory details and exceptions.
This is a trap for people injured by public vehicles, unsafe public property, government employees, county agencies, schools, municipalities, and other public entities. If a government defendant may be involved, you need legal review fast.
Wisconsin Comparative Fault Rule
Wisconsin does not follow a pure comparative fault rule. Wisconsin follows modified comparative negligence. Under Wisconsin Statute 895.045, a plaintiff’s negligence does not bar recovery if the plaintiff’s negligence is not greater than the negligence of the person against whom recovery is sought, but the plaintiff’s damages are reduced by the percentage of fault assigned to the plaintiff.
In a simple two-party car accident case, that usually means a plaintiff who is 50 percent at fault can still recover 50 percent of damages, but a plaintiff who is 51 percent at fault recovers nothing.
Here is the practical example. If a jury awards $100,000 and finds the plaintiff 30 percent at fault, the plaintiff receives $70,000. If the same jury finds the plaintiff 51 percent at fault, the plaintiff may recover nothing from that defendant.
This is why defendants spend so much energy blaming the injured person. They are not just trying to reduce the number. They are trying to push the plaintiff past the line where recovery disappears.
Does Wisconsin Have Caps on Damages?
Wisconsin does not have a general cap on pain and suffering damages in ordinary personal injury cases. The original version of this page suggested a general $750,000 noneconomic damages cap. That is not the right way to state Wisconsin law.
Wisconsin does cap noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases. For medical malpractice judgments and settlements, the noneconomic damages cap is $750,000 per occurrence. The Wisconsin Supreme Court has upheld this cap.
Wisconsin also caps punitive damages at the greater of $200,000 or two times compensatory damages.
Wrongful death has its own limitation on loss of society and companionship damages. Wisconsin law caps those additional damages at $500,000 per occurrence for a deceased minor and $350,000 per occurrence for a deceased adult.
Chart: Wisconsin Injury Deadlines and Damage Rules
| Issue | Wisconsin Rule | Reader Warning |
|---|---|---|
| Personal Injury | Most injury claims must be filed within three years. | Do not wait for settlement negotiations to finish if the deadline is approaching. |
| Motor Vehicle Wrongful Death | Wrongful death from a motor vehicle accident generally has a two year deadline. | This shorter deadline surprises families. |
| Medical Malpractice | Generally three years from malpractice or one year from discovery, with a five year repose period. | Medical malpractice deadlines are technical and unforgiving. |
| Government Claims | A notice of claim may be required within 120 days. | Public defendant cases need immediate review. |
| Medical Malpractice Pain and Suffering | Noneconomic damages are capped at $750,000 per occurrence. | Economic damages, such as future medical care, are treated separately. |
| Punitive Damages | Capped at the greater of $200,000 or twice compensatory damages. | Punitive damages are not available in most ordinary negligence cases. |
Medical Malpractice Lawsuits in Wisconsin
Medical malpractice lawsuits in Wisconsin are governed by Wisconsin Chapter 655. There are no ordinary common law medical malpractice claims against covered providers in the same way lawyers might discuss malpractice in other states. Wisconsin has a statutory scheme for health care liability, the Injured Patients and Families Compensation Fund, and special rules that surprise lawyers unfamiliar with Wisconsin malpractice cases. Wisconsin Chapter 655.
One of the harsh quirks is standing in medical malpractice wrongful death cases. Adult children may lack standing to bring certain wrongful death claims against covered health care providers. That is not intuitive. Most families assume adult children can bring a claim after a parent dies from medical malpractice. Wisconsin law may say otherwise, depending on the facts and claim structure.
What You Need to Win a Wisconsin Medical Malpractice Lawsuit
To win a medical malpractice lawsuit in Wisconsin, the plaintiff must prove that the health care provider made a mistake or failed to act properly, falling below the accepted standard of care, and that this caused the injury.
Because medical issues usually involve knowledge outside what jurors understand, expert testimony is almost always required. A medical expert must explain the standard of care, how the defendant failed to meet it, and how that failure caused harm. Without expert testimony, the judge may dismiss the case before it reaches a jury.
Expert Testimony in Wisconsin Malpractice Cases
Wisconsin medical malpractice cases require expert testimony to establish the standard of care in most cases. Wisconsin Statute 907.02 aligns with the federal expert witness reliability framework, meaning the circuit court acts as a gatekeeper before expert testimony is admitted.
In practical terms, the plaintiff needs qualified experts who can explain what a reasonably careful doctor, nurse, hospital, radiologist, anesthesiologist, or other provider should have done and how the mistake caused injury.
Attorney Fees in Wisconsin Medical Malpractice Cases
Wisconsin caps contingency fees in medical malpractice cases. Under Wisconsin Statute 655.013, attorney fees are generally limited to 33 and one-third percent of the first $1,000,000 recovered, with different limits when liability is stipulated, and 20 percent of amounts over $1,000,000. A court may approve fees above the statutory limits in exceptional circumstances.
This rule sounds friendly to victims because it limits lawyer fees. In reality, it can make complex malpractice cases harder to bring. The best lawyers in Wisconsin are usually less willing to take borderline, expensive, expert-heavy cases when the fee structure makes it difficult to justify the risk. So while it sounds good for victims, fee rules make access to court harder for some victims.
Collateral Source Rule in Wisconsin
In most Wisconsin personal injury cases, the collateral source rule prevents defendants from reducing their responsibility because the plaintiff had insurance or received payments from another source. The defendant does not get a discount because the injured person had health insurance.
Medical malpractice is different. Wisconsin makes it tougher on medical malpractice victims by allowing evidence of collateral source payments in some malpractice actions if the evidence is probative of a fact of consequence. This can affect how damages are presented to a jury.
Wisconsin Wrongful Death Law
The wrongful death statute creates a new cause of action and permits certain individuals to seek recovery for their own losses resulting from someone else’s wrongful death. For a wrongful death lawsuit to be valid, the deceased person generally must have had a legitimate claim for damages against the defendant at the time of death.
A Wisconsin wrongful death lawsuit may be brought by the personal representative of the deceased person or by the person to whom the amount recovered belongs. Wisconsin law also sets limits on loss of society and companionship damages, with different caps for the death of a minor and the death of an adult.
Wrongful death claims are emotionally hard and legally technical. The family is grieving while the law is asking about beneficiaries, estate representatives, deadlines, medical bills, funeral expenses, lost financial support, and statutory caps. A lawyer needs to sort that out early.
Wisconsin Dog Bite Lawsuits
Wisconsin has strict liability for dog bite and dog attack cases. Under Wisconsin Statute 174.02, a dog owner is generally liable for the full amount of damages caused by the dog injuring or causing injury to a person, animal, or property, subject to comparative fault rules.
That means a dog bite victim generally does not have to prove the dog had bitten someone before. The owner can still raise defenses, especially comparative negligence, but Wisconsin’s dog bite law is favorable to injured victims compared with one bite rule states.
Wisconsin Sex Abuse Lawsuits
Sex abuse lawsuits in Wisconsin allow victims to seek compensation from perpetrators and, in some cases, from third-party entities such as schools, churches, youth organizations, treatment facilities, or other institutions that negligently enabled or failed to prevent abuse.
These cases are often difficult because Wisconsin has restrictive civil statute of limitations rules compared with many other states. Wisconsin Statute 893.587 provides that an action to recover damages for injury caused by certain acts of child sexual assault must be commenced before the injured party reaches age 35.
For survivors abused as adults, the deadlines can be much shorter. These cases should be reviewed quickly because the statute of limitations can decide the case before anyone can present the evidence of abuse.
Res Ipsa in Wisconsin
The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur in Wisconsin is an evidentiary rule that permits the fact finder to draw a permissible inference of negligence without direct or expert testimony that the defendant breached the standard of care.
To use res ipsa loquitur, the plaintiff generally must show that the event is the type that does not ordinarily occur in the absence of negligence, the agency or instrumentality of harm was in the exclusive control of the defendant, and the causation evidence is not enough to provide a full explanation but is more than mere speculation.
If the court finds the rule applies, the result is a permissible inference of negligence. Res ipsa does not create a presumption of negligence in Wisconsin. It simply allows the jury to infer negligence if the facts support that inference.
This is how the res ipsa loquitur jury instruction would be given to a Wisconsin jury.
Wisconsin Product Liability and Mass Tort Cases
Product manufacturers and sellers can be held liable under Wisconsin law if a product is defective and that defect causes injury or harm. Wisconsin law recognizes the three basic types of product defects: manufacturing defect, design defect, and failure to warn.
There are a number of national mass torts or class action-style litigations that involve Wisconsin plaintiffs, including claims our law firm is handling across the country.
Here are a few examples of the many cases that are out there. The hair relaxer lawsuit involves claims that long-term use of chemical hair relaxer products can cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer, uterine fibroids, and other injuries. The Roundup lawsuit involves claims that Roundup exposure can cause non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The PowerPort lawsuit involves claims that Bard PowerPort devices can fracture, migrate, or cause infection and other injuries. The Depo Provera lawsuit involves allegations that the contraceptive injection increases the risk of meningioma brain tumors after prolonged exposure.
How Wisconsin Injury Lawyers Build a Case
A serious Wisconsin injury case is not built by collecting a few medical bills and sending a demand letter. That may work for a small claim. It does not work for a serious case.
Good lawyers investigate liability, preserve evidence, collect the full medical record, identify all insurance coverage, consult experts, document lost wages, evaluate future care needs, and prepare the case as if it may be tried. That trial preparation is what creates settlement pressure.
Insurance companies do not pay full value because the plaintiff asks nicely. They pay when the proof creates risk.
Contact Us About Wisconsin Injury Cases
Our firm handles serious injury and wrongful death lawsuits in Wisconsin, working with trusted colleagues in Wisconsin who also have a history of maximizing the value of personal injury claims.
Our law firm compensates your Wisconsin lawyers out of our attorneys’ fees. So you pay absolutely no additional contingency fees, and you have two law firms instead of one. Also important: you pay nothing unless you get settlement compensation or a jury payout.
If you were hurt and believe you have a potential claim and you want justice, click here for a free no-obligation consultation or call us today at 800-553-8082.