Articles Posted in Mass Torts

I want to give you honest answers to your questions about the Suboxone lawsuits.

I’ve been reading over other lawyers’ pages, even our pages… I don’t think we are answering the real questions victims have, including what Suboxone per-person settlement payouts we expect for a Suboxone lawsuit.  So this is the inside story and answers to your questions about settlement and the possible timing for receiving the compensation you deserve. Continue reading

The Cartiva toe implant is a synthetic cartilage device used to treat arthritis in the big toe. New evidence suggests that these implants are defectively designed and prone to failures that can result in pain, further surgery, and other injuries. Cartiva toe implant lawsuits are now being filed by individuals who experienced a premature failure of their implant.

We hoped to see Cartiva settlement payouts by 2025 as part of a global settlement. That has not happened. Unfortunately, this litigation is dragging on. But these lawsuits could reach a settlement at any time. You want to submit a case before that happens. So, if you have a claim, call us or another lawyer sooner rather than later.

Not many of these lawsuits have been filed.   But there are many more cases out there, and that is likely to change if there is no settlement soon. If you have a potential claim, call us today at 800-553-8082 or get a free consultation online.

This page provides clear answers to the most common questions about Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuits about Depo Provera brain tumor lawsuits.

So many Depo Provera lawyers are explaining the same things over and over.  We might be guilty of that ourselves. But this page is not about selling us to you—it is about answering the real questions you have about the litigation that are not being answered anywhere.  We cut through the nonsense and tell you what you really need to know if you have a meningioma brain tumor and are considering signing up for these lawsuits.

We begin with information on Depo Provera generally and how it is linked.  Most women reading this are well-versed in this information. If so, you can jump ahead to the details of what you need to know if you are considering bringing a Depo Provera lawsuit.

A new study from NIH found that using chemical hair relaxers such as Softsheen-Carson Optimum, can increase the risk of uterine cancer by 150%. The publication of this new evidence has led to hair relaxer lawsuits being filed against L’Oreal and its subsidiary SoftSheen-Caron. The plaintiffs filing these lawsuits are alleging that the chemicals in hair relaxer products like Optimum caused them to develop uterine cancer (or related conditions such as uterine fibroids and endometriosis).

In this post, we will discuss the new evidence on uterine cancer and hair relaxer and the allegations in the lawsuits against L’Oreal regarding its SoftSheen Carson product line. We will also look at the potential settlement value of these cases.

New scientific evidence has established a link between female cancers (ovarian and uterine) and long-term use of chemical hair relaxers. Luster’s Smooth Touch and Luster’s Pink are two famous chemical hair relaxers/straighteners. Many women who used Smooth Touch, Pink, or other Luster relaxer products and subsequently developed uterine cancer, ovarian cancer, uterine fibroids, or endometriosis may be able to file a hair relaxer lawsuit and get financial compensation. Hair relaxer cancer lawsuits are already being filed around the country. Hair relaxer cases in federal courts have already been consolidated into a new class action lawsuit.

This post will examine the recent medical evidence linking relaxers to uterine and ovarian cancer and the lawsuits against Luster Products Inc. regarding its Smooth Touch and Pink line of relaxer products.

Our firm is investigating chemical hair relaxer lawsuits that allege chemicals in Luster Smooth Touch hair relaxer cause uterine cancer and other conditions. If you believe you may be eligible for a lawsuit involving a chemical hair straightener, please contact our office today for a complimentary consultation at 800-553-8082 or schedule a free online consultation.

Most of our hair relaxer uterine fibroid lawsuits involve women who require a hysterectomy to treat their condition.  But our lawyers are also seeing claims from victims who need a myomectomy to treat fibroids that chemical hair straighteners may have caused.

We believe myomectomy claims may also receive significant settlement compensation in the new hair relaxer class action lawsuit, although these cases are separated from the MDL in 2025 as we explain below.

The page talks about myomectomy lawsuits in this litigation and speculates about the settlement payouts victims might receive. Elsewhere, we give you the latest hair relaxer lawsuit update tracking where we are in the litigation.

Our national mass tort lawyers are pursuing cases in a number of class action lawsuits. Thousands of Alabama residents could potentially be eligible to become plaintiffs in many of these mass tort cases.

In this post, we will summarize the most significant class action lawsuits that Alabama residents should be aware of. We will also explain who is eligible to become plaintiffs in the various class action lawsuits, their potential chances of success, and their potential settlement value if successful.


RELATED CONTENT:

This page examines silicosis lawsuits, their potential settlement amounts, and jury payouts.

Silicosis is a lung disease caused by occupational exposure to airborne silica dust particles from stone like granite, quartz, and other construction materials. Anyone who was exposed to silica dust from construction materials and has been diagnosed with silicosis may be eligible to file a silicosis lawsuit and receive financial compensation. Our silicosis lawyers explain how silicosis lawsuits work and the potential settlement value of these cases.

Latest Silicosis Legal News

Our toxic baby food lawyers seek new cases from children (and their parents) who consumed HappyBaby baby foods and were subsequently diagnosed with autism.  Every day, parents reach out to our lawyers looking to see if there is a connection between the baby food their child eats and a later autism diagnosis.

The core of every HappyBby food lawsuit is that Nurture and its parent company, Danone, knowingly sold baby food products despite internal tests revealing dangerously high levels of toxic heavy metals. Their testing showed inorganic arsenic levels as high as 180 ppb, with over 25% of tested products exceeding 100 ppb—miles above FDA safety limits. On average, their baby food contained 60 ppb of inorganic arsenic. Even more concerning, some products tested as high as 641 ppb of lead, while nearly 20% contained over 10 ppb lead. Additionally, Nurture and Danone sold baby food with mercury levels reaching 10 ppb, further exposing infants to harmful neurotoxins.  That is what these baby food lawsuits involving HappyBaby are about.

If you have a potential toxic baby food autism lawsuit involving HappyBaby or any of the other defendants, call us today at 800-553-8082 or reach out to us online.