Articles Posted in Legal News

On this page, we will explain how former inmates who were sexually abused at Camden County Juvenile Detention Center can file civil lawsuits and get financial compensation.

Our national sex abuse lawyers are currently accepting New Jersey juvenile detention center sex abuse lawsuits involving facilities across the state. If you were the victim of sexual abuse or assault at a New Jersey juvenile detention center, call us today at 800-553-8082 or contact us online.

NJ Juvenile Detention Sex Abuse:
New Jersey Juvenile Female Secure Facility Sex Abuse Lawsuits
New Jersey Training School Sex Abuse Lawsuits
NJ Juvenile Medium Security Facility Sex Abuse Lawsuits

About Camden County Juvenile Detention Center

The Camden County Juvenile Detention Center (CCJDC) is a secure, pre-trial facility located in Blackwood, New Jersey. It serves as the primary detention center for juveniles from Camden County who are awaiting court proceedings related to delinquent behavior. The center accommodates both male and female residents and operates under the oversight of the Camden County Department of Corrections.

Juvenile inmates at CCJDC are required to participate in the facility’s educational program, which involves a normal school schedule Monday thru Friday. In addition to academic instruction, the center offers substance abuse and mental health programs to address underlying issues contributing to delinquent behavior. These programs aim to equip juveniles with the tools necessary for successful reintegration into society.

Sexual Abuse of Inmates at CCJDC

New Jersey’s juvenile detention facilities have a terrible reputation in terms of neglect and abuse of inmates. The state level juvenile detention centers in New Jersey are widely considered to be some of the worst in the country. CCJDC is somewhat different because it is operated by Camden County rather than the state of New Jersey (which are operated by the New Jersey Juvenile Justice Commission). That does not mean, however, that CCJDC is immune from the same issues that have led to systemic abuse of juvenile inmates in the state facilities.

Like most juvenile facilities, CCJDC has faced numerous allegations of inmate sexual abuse over the years. The frequency of staff-on-inmate sexual abuse is largely the result of institutional neglect and lack of oversight.

These problems are not isolated. Instead, they stem from structural failures, including inadequate supervision, insufficient staff training, chronic understaffing, and poor accountability protocols—all of which have enabled abusive behavior to go unchecked.

One of the most serious failures at CCJDC has been its repeated dismissal of credible allegations from juvenile inmates regarding staff misconduct. Complaints of abuse were frequently disregarded, mishandled, or left uninvestigated, and in some instances, facility administrators allegedly shielded accused staff or actively suppressed evidence of wrongdoing.

Holding Camden County Liable

Camden County has a legal and constitutional obligation to take reasonable measures to protect juvenile detainees at CCJDC from sexual abuse and assault. This duty includes not only preventing misconduct by staff members but also safeguarding youth from harm posed by other detainees. To meet this obligation, Camden County was required to develop, implement, and enforce comprehensive policies and procedures aimed at preventing sexual abuse within the facility.

Despite this mandate, mounting evidence suggests that Camden County failed to fulfill its responsibilities at CCJDC. Reports of abuse were met with inadequate responses from both state authorities and facility personnel. These failures included poor staff supervision, ineffective or nonexistent policies, insufficient training, and a lack of meaningful safety protocols.

As a result of this negligence, Camden County may be held liable through civil litigation. Individuals who experienced sexual abuse while confined at CCJDC may have the legal right to seek compensation for the harm they suffered as a result of Camden County’s failure to protect them.

Identification of the Abuser Is Not Required

Victims of sexual abuse or assault at juvenile facilities such as CCJDC often believe they must know the name of the staff member who harmed them in order to pursue legal action. This is actually NOT true. Victims are not legally required to identify or name their abuser at the time a civil lawsuit is filed.

In fact, most victims who file juvenile detention sex abuse lawsuits are not able to provide the name of their abuser. Most victims are only able to provide a general physical description of the person(s) who abused them. A general description of the perpetrator or the circumstances surrounding the abuse is all that is necessary to move forward with a civil lawsuit.

Once the case is initiated, the discovery process allows attorneys to obtain additional information—such as staff rosters, surveillance records, and internal reports—which can assist in identifying the individual responsible.

Although identification is not necessary to file a claim, being able to name the abuser can significantly strengthen the case. This is particularly true if the staff member has a documented history of misconduct, prior allegations of abuse, or if they have been criminally charged for similar offenses. Such details can help establish a pattern of behavior and support claims of negligence by the facility.

How Much Are CCJDC Sex Abuse Lawsuits Worth?

If you’re thinking about filing a lawsuit for sexual abuse that happened at CCJDC, you might be wondering how much a case like this could be worth. The truth is, it depends on several factors. Here’s a breakdown of what can affect the potential settlement:

  1. How Serious the Abuse Was
    The more severe the abuse, the higher the potential compensation. If the victim has been diagnosed with things like PTSD, anxiety, depression, or physical injuries, that can really increase the value of the case. But even if there aren’t medical records, a strong case can still be built with support from mental health professionals who can speak to the emotional impact of the abuse.
  2. What Kind of Evidence Is Available
    A victim’s testimony alone can be powerful, but additional evidence—like reports, witness statements, or proof that the facility ignored warning signs—can boost the settlement amount. Showing that the detention center failed to protect its residents or had serious flaws in its system can make the case even stronger.
  3. How Old the Victim Was
    Generally, the younger the victim at the time of the abuse, the higher the settlement. That’s because the trauma can have long-lasting effects on a young person’s emotional development and future.
  4. Whether the Abuser Can Be Identified
    You don’t need to know who the abuser was to file a lawsuit, but if the victim can identify them—especially if that person has a history of misconduct—it can really help the case. It shows a pattern and makes it harder for the facility to deny responsibility.

Contact Us About CCJDC Sex Abuse Lawsuits

We are accepting Camden County Juvenile Detention Center sex abuse lawsuits. Call us at 800-553-8082 or contact us online.

This page looks at sexual abuse lawsuits involving juvenile inmates at the Cook County Juvenile Temporary Detention Center (commonly known as the Audy Center or Audy Home).

Like many juvenile detention facilities across Illinois, rampant sexual abuse, violence, and mistreatment plagued the Audy Center for decades. For too long, Cook County officials and detention leadership failed to protect the vulnerable youth in their custody, allowing widespread abuse to occur behind locked doors. Staff misconduct, systemic negligence, and an entrenched culture of silence turned the facility into a breeding ground for trauma rather than rehabilitation. As a result, survivors are now stepping forward to file lawsuits, seeking not only compensation for their suffering but also accountability for a system that betrayed them.

If you believe you have a potential sex abuse lawsuit involving the Audy Center in Cook County, contact our sex abuse lawyers today at 800-553-8082 or get a free online consultation. We are committed to fighting for survivors and holding Cook County and its officials accountable for the harm they allowed to happen.

Over the past several years, numerous lawsuits have been filed against New Hampshire’s juvenile detention facilities, particularly the Sununu Youth Services Center (formerly known as the Youth Development Center), alleging decades of physical and sexual abuse by staff members. These allegations have led to criminal charges, civil lawsuits, and significant settlements.

Since 2020, nearly 1,300 survivors have come forward with harrowing accounts of abuse inside YDC. These allegations include rape, violent beatings, and emotional torture spanning from the 1960s through the 2010s. Lawsuits claim that state employees not only committed these crimes but operated with impunity for decades, protected by a system designed to hide abuse rather than stop it.

Our sex abuse lawyers are helping victims of juvenile detention center sex abuse get the compensation they deserve. Contact us at 800-553-8082 or reach out to us online for a free case evaluation.

This page will look at sex abuse lawsuits involving juvenile inmates at Twin Pines Ranch Juvenile Detention Center, which is now closed. From 1967 to 2014, Twin Pines Ranch housed male juvenile offenders, many of whom were victims of sexual abuse and assault by staff members due to the negligence of the Riverside County Probation Department. These victims can now bring civil lawsuits and get compensation.

If you have a potential sex abuse lawsuit involving Twin Pines Ranch in Riverside County, call our California sex abuse lawyers, today at 800-553-8082 or get a free online consultation.

About Twin Pines Ranch Juvenile Detention Center

On this page, our national sex abuse lawyers will discuss lawsuits against dating app companies for negligently failing to protect users from sexual assault or abuse. These dating app sex abuse lawsuits are getting filed across the country in large numbers and they assert that dating apps like Tinder, Hinge, OkCupid and others have negligently failed to screen potentially dangerous users.

Dating Apps

These days dating apps are the primary way that single people meet each other and start relationships. Research has shown that more relationships originate from dating apps now than from traditional venues like bars, church, school, etc. That means that literally millions of people and finding and meeting each other through dating apps.

Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) has faced extensive litigation across the country, including in Illinois, where several of its behavioral health facilities have been implicated in lawsuits related to the sexual abuse of patients. Among the most notorious UHS-operated facilities in Illinois with documented abuse allegations are Riveredge Hospital, Streamwood Behavioral Health, Rock River Academy (now closed), and Pavilion Behavioral Health System. These facilities, designed to provide mental health treatment to vulnerable individuals, particularly minors, have instead become sites of widespread allegations of abuse, neglect, and administrative failures that allowed sexual predators to exploit patients under their care.

The UHS Model: Profits Over Patient Safety

Universal Health Services is one of the largest behavioral health providers in the United States, operating hundreds of psychiatric hospitals, residential treatment centers, and outpatient programs nationwide. However, its history is marred by repeated accusations of understaffing, inadequate supervision, and systemic failures to protect patients.

Video game addiction lawsuits, particularly those involving Fortnite, are gaining momentum as public awareness about the harm caused by gaming addiction grows. Fortnite, one of the most popular and addictive games in the world, has become the focal point of many gaming addiction lawsuits filed against its creator, Epic Games. These Fortnite lawsuits allege that Fortnite’s addictive qualities have caused severe mental, emotional, and physical harm, particularly to young players, sparking claims of negligent design and failure to warn.

Many lawyers rolled their eyes at these lawsuits when victims first began filing them. No one is rolling there eyes anymore. We are learning more and more about how Fortnite addiction is no accident.

Our lawyers discuss here gaming addiction and the very addictive qualities of Fornite specifically. We will also look at the allegations being made in Fortnite addiction lawsuits and the potential settlement amounts victims will see if these lawsuit are as succesful as our attorneys expect.

Rybelsus is a semaglutide drug made by Novo Nordisk. Although approved for diabetes treatment, Rybelsus is now widely used for weight loss similar to other drugs like Ozempic or Wegovy. New research has shown that using Rybelsus at higher dose levels for weight loss can cause a host of very serious health problems. Health conditions linked to Rybelsus include: gastroparesis or gastrointestinal conditions, including bowel obstruction or cyclic vomiting syndrome, and NAION vision loss.

If you used Rybelsus and suffered any of these health problems or injuries, you may be able to file a product liability lawsuit and get financial compensation. Our firm is currently accepting Rybelsus lawsuits from individuals with any of the following injuries:

  • Vision loss from NAION  (nonarthritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy)

Prilosec and Nexium kidney damage class action lawsuits are still being filed around the country.

Thousands of Proton Pump Inhibitor lawsuits have been filed around the country by plaintiffs who allege that PPI drugs like Nexium and Prilosec caused them to develop permanent kidney damage, bone fractures, and interstitial nephritis. As of August 2023, there are nearly 13,000 Nexium and Prilosec kidney damage lawsuits pending in a class action MDL.  Settlement rumors in this litigation are swirling.

September 2024 Parkinson’s PPI Link?

Our law firm  was handling Philips CPAP machine lawsuits for injuries from the recalled Philips CPAP machine.

The Philips recall covered an estimated 3.5 million sleep apnea devices. A CPAP class action lawsuit with thousands of plaintiffs has been consolidated into a multi-district litigation (MDL-1230). So, every Philips CPAP lawsuit in federal court—filed in New York, California, Texas, or wherever—was consolidated in federal court in Pennsylvania.

After the settlement, we are no longer reviewing new cases.

Contact Information