Virginia Personal Injury Law and Settlements

On this page, we will examine Virginia personal injury lawsuits and their settlement value. We will explain some of the basic rules of tort law in Virginia, such as what types of damages plaintiffs can get and how long they have to file their case. We will also explore the average settlement value of personal injury lawsuits in Virginia.

Statute of Limitations on Virginia Personal Injury Lawsuits

In Virginia, most personal injury, cases must be filed within two years of when the negligence occurred or the “claim accrues” (Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-230). If you don’t file your lawsuit before the 2-year period expires, it will be legally barred.

Like most states, Virginia follows the “discovery rule” to determine when the 2-year limitations period begins. Under this doctrine, a claim accrues when the plaintiff knows or reasonably should know that they potentially have a legal claim against the defendant.

In auto accident cases, the claim accrues on the accident date because any reasonable person should understand that they have a claim against an at-fault driver. In malpractice cases, however, the date when the claim accrues can be much more complicated.

Virginia Sex Abuse Lawsuits

Anyone who was the victim of sexual abuse or sexual assault in Virginia has the right to file a civil lawsuit and get financial compensation for their injuries. Virginia law allows victims to bring a lawsuit not just against the individual perpetrator, but also against third parties such as schools, churches, or companies. These third parties can be sued if their negligence enabled the sexual abuse to occur.

SOL in Virginia Sex Abuse Lawsuits

Virginia sex abuse lawsuits are subject to a separate statute of limitations period depending on whether the abuse transpired when the victim was an adult or a child. If the abuse occurred during the victim’s childhood (under 18 years old), Virginia law grants them until their 38th birthday (20 years following their 18th birthday) to initiate a civil lawsuit regarding the abuse (Va. Stat. § 8.01-243(D)).

Conversely, if the victim was an adult when the abuse occurred, they must file a lawsuit within 2 years from the date of the incident. However, a new law enacted in March 2023 in Virginia extends this timeframe for adult victims of sexual abuse to 15 years if the abuse was perpetrated by a “person of authority.”

Damages Available in Virginia Personal Injury Cases

Under Virginia law, anyone physically injured by the negligent or reckless conduct of another person or entity is entitled to hold that person financially responsible for the “damages” caused by the injuries. Damages are intended to make the plaintiff whole by restoring them to their position before the injuries. In Virginia, personal injury plaintiffs are entitled to three different categories of damages:

• Pain and Suffering: under Virginia law, injured plaintiffs can also collect damages for mental pain & suffering related to the physical injuries caused by the defendant’s negligence.  This is usually the largest element of damages in any Virgina personal injury lawsuit.
• Medical Expenses: Virginia accident victims are entitled to compensation for the full cost of all medical care and treatment for the injuries caused by the defendant’s negligence. The plaintiff is entitled to recover the full cost as long as the treatment is medically necessary and reasonable. This includes the cost of future medical treatment that may be required down the road.’
• Lost Income: Virginia plaintiffs can get damages for any lost wages or lost income that they incurred as a direct result of the injuries caused by the defendant. For example, Jack is rear-ended by Jill and injures his back. Jack can’t return to his job as a roofer for six months after the accident. When he finally does go back, Jack can no longer get up on the roofs, and his company has to move him to a desk job that pays $20,000 less per year. If Jack brings a personal injury lawsuit against Jill, he would be entitled to damages for the six weeks of lost wages plus the $20,000 per year in future lost income.

Caps on Damages in Virginia Injury Cases

For most personal injury cases in Virginia, there is no maximum cap or limit on the amount of damages a plaintiff can get. However, Virginia does have a damages cap that applies to injury cases involving medical malpractice. Damages in Virginia medical malpractice cases are capped at $2.55 million, although the cap increases every year. This cap set the maximum amount of all types of damages that a plaintiff can get in an medical malpractice case.

Contributory Negligence Not Comparative Negligence

Virginia operates under the “contributory negligence” rule. This means that if a plaintiff is found even 1% at fault for the injury, they may be barred from recovering any damages. This standard is stricter than the “comparative negligence” rule adopted by many other states.

Defendants asserting the contributory negligence defense against a plaintiff must show that the plaintiff’s negligent actions were a direct or contributing factor leading to the accident.

Contributory Negligence and Medical Malpractice

Contributory negligence works a little differently in Virginia malpractice lawsuits. In malpractice cases, the plaintiff’s negligence must be contemporaneous with the defendant’s negligence for it to qualify as contributory negligence. To bar recovery, the plaintiff’s negligent act must occur at the same time as the physician’s alleged negligent act. This duty arises after receiving negligent medical care or following negligent treatment by the physician. The mitigation instruction applies when there is evidence that a patient, after an act of malpractice, failed to exercise ordinary care for their own health, thereby increasing their damages.

Virginia Dog Bite Law

In Virginia, dog bite law incorporates elements of both strict liability and the “one bite rule.” This means that a dog owner can be held responsible for injuries inflicted by their dog, regardless of whether they were previously aware of the dog’s dangerous nature.

For a successful dog bite claim in Virginia, a victim must demonstrate the following:

1. The defendant had ownership or control of the dog.
2. The dog bit or attacked the plaintiff.
3. The plaintiff endured injury due to this dog bite or attack.

Dangerous and Vicious Dog

Under Virginia Code sections 3.2-6540 and -6540.1, Virginia Code sections 3.2-6540 and 3.2-6540.1 define “dangerous dog” and “vicious dog,” stating that a dog owner’s notice of their dog previously inflicting injury is required for liability. When a dog injures another person or animal, it places the dog owner on notice of their dog’s dangerous or vicious tendencies, imposing a heightened standard of care regarding their dog’s future actions.

One Bite Rule

This is often referred to as the “one bite” rule, which we will explain i If the dog owner is not aware of the dog’s propensities, Virginia case law suggests that the dog owner has a common law duty to exercise ordinary care to protect individuals from injuries inflicted by their dog and can be held civilly liable for breaching that duty.

Subsequently, the owner should exercise greater caution regarding their dog’s future behavior. This principle is commonly known as the “one bite” rule. However, if an owner hasn’t been made aware of their dog’s tendencies, Virginia jurisprudence suggests that the dog owner still has “the duty of using ordinary care to prevent his dog from injuring others.”

Virginia’s “one bite rule” often confuses many. Contrary to its name, the rule doesn’t grant every dog a “free bite.” Instead, the rule states that a dog owner might not be held liable the first time their dog bites, unless it can be evidenced that the owner was, or should have been, aware of the dog’s aggressive tendencies. Even without a prior bite, behaviors like growling or snapping can hint at a dog’s aggressive nature. If the dog owner is not aware of the dog’s propensities, Virginia case law suggests that the dog owner has a common law duty to exercise ordinary care to protect individuals from injuries inflicted by their dog and can be held civilly liable for breaching that duty.

There are exceptions to the “one bite rule.” For instance, if the owner had knowledge of the dog’s potential danger before any bite or if they failed to adhere to local leash laws, they could still face liability.

Virginia Wrongful Death Lawsuits

In the event of a death as the result of negligence in Virginia, two distinct legal claims can arise. Under Va. Code § 8.01-50, a wrongful death claim allows an administrator to initiate a lawsuit if a person’s death results from wrongful acts or neglect.

The potential damages in such cases are detailed in Va. Code § 8.01-52, while the distribution method is outlined in Va. Code § 8.01-53. This section explicitly outlines the categories of eligible beneficiaries.

Under the Death by Wrongful Act Statute, the personal representative of the decedent holds a crucial role. This personal representative, which includes the executor or administrator of a decedent’s estate, must be court-qualified to act in this capacity (Va. Code Ann. § 1-234). Only the personal representative is authorized to bring a wrongful death action and must do so in their name.

Any wrongful death award recovered in such an action is paid to the personal representative (Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-54(C)). From the gross award, the personal representative is responsible for paying costs, reasonable attorney’s fees – usually the contingency fees the wrongful death lawyer charges –  and hospital, medical, and funeral expenses. The remaining amount is then distributed by the personal representative to the beneficiaries.

Secondly, there’s a survival claim for personal injuries under § 8.01-25. This allows a personal injury claim to continue even after the injured person’s death, as long as the injurious actions did not directly result in the death.

Who Can File a Wrongful Death Claim in Virginia?

The personal representative of the deceased’s estate typically files a wrongful death claim. However, the compensation is intended for the deceased’s statutory beneficiaries. These beneficiaries, in the order of priority, include:

• Surviving spouse and children or grandchildren.
• Surviving parents, siblings, or any relative who shared the deceased’s household and was a dependent.
• Surviving family members who would inherit the deceased’s estate if there were no will.

Types of Damages for Wrongful Death

In a wrongful death claim in Virginia, the following damages may be sought:

• Sorrow and mental anguish.
• Loss of the deceased’s companionship, guidance, and advice.
• Lost wages and benefits (including future earnings the deceased could reasonably have been expected to earn).
• Medical expenses related to the deceased’s final illness or injury.
• Reasonable funeral and burial expenses.
• Punitive damages if the death was caused by willful or wanton conduct.

Time Limit to File

Virginia has a statute of limitations for wrongful death claims. Generally, a lawsuit must be filed within two years of the date of death.

Survival Actions vs. Wrongful Death Claims

Again, Virginia law differentiates between survival actions and wrongful death claims. A survival action is brought on behalf of the deceased and seeks compensation for the damages they suffered before their death, such as pain and suffering. In contrast, a wrongful death claim compensates the surviving family members for their losses stemming from their loved one’s death. So the survival action recovery is damages that the deceased would have been entitled to if they had survived. These recovered damages are considered assets of the estate and can be used to settle any outstanding debts of the deceased.

Settlement Value of Virginia Personal Injury Lawsuits

The potential value of a Virginia personal injury lawsuit in a settlement or trial depends on several different factors. The most significant factor by far is the severity level of the plaintiff’s physical injuries. Cases involving more serious, permanent injuries have a higher settlement value. The chart below shows average settlement values for Virginia personal injury cases based on injury level.

LEVEL OF INJURY	AVERAGE VALUE
LEVEL 1 (Minor)	$18,000 – $32,000
LEVEL 2 (Moderate)	$61,000 – $145,000
LEVEL 3 (Major)	$245,000 – $730,000

Of course, there are settlement payouts and jury awards that are less or more than these ranges.  But this covers most claims.

There are many other factor besides injury severity that impact the potential value of case.  The type of personal injury case (e.g., auto accident vs. medical malpractice) often makes a big difference, in part because of the amount of available insurance to cover any damages. Another major factor is the location or venue of the case.

Virginia Mass Tort Cases

There are a number of national mass torts or “class actions” that involve thousands of Virginia plaintiffs, including claims our law firm is handling across the country:

• Paraquat Lawsuits: Paraquat suits allege that farmers exposed to Paraquat are suffering from Parkinson’s disease from the pesticide
• Hair relaxer lawsuit: recent evidence has shown that long-term use of chemical hair relaxer products (most commonly used by African American women) can cause cancer and other conditions.
• Bard PowerPort Lawsuit: Complications, including infections and thrombosis associated with the use of Bard PowerPort devices
• Depo Provera Lawsuit: Depo Provera is better known as the birth control shot. It is an injectable contraceptive drug that has been around since the 1990s. New evidence linking Depo Provera to meningioma brain tumors has prompted a wave of lawsuits.
• Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit: Transvaginal mesh implants, often used to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, have been linked to severe complications. Women have reported erosion of the mesh into surrounding tissue, chronic pain, organ perforation, infections, and the need for multiple revision surgeries. These complications have led to widespread litigation against device manufacturers.
• Spinal Stimulator Lawsuit: These claims involve injuries caused by an implanted spinal cord stimulator, a medical device intended to treat chronic back or spinal pain by disrupting pain signals before they reach the brain. The claim centers on patients who say the device did not simply fail to relieve pain. Instead, it caused new and serious complications, including electrical shocks, burning or worsening pain, infections, lead migration, device malfunction, and the need for multiple follow-up surgeries to reposition or remove hardware. According to the allegations, a device marketed as a quality of life improvement instead exposed patients to avoidable risks and long-term harm.

Virginia Personal Injury Verdicts and Settlements

$125,000 Settlement (E.D. Virginia 2025): An elderly man was admitted to the defendant’s skilled nursing facility after suffering a stroke that left him immobile. He developed a sacral bed sore which required surgical debridement and had copious amounts of purulent discharge, necrotic tissue and exposed coccyx bone. He eventually died from sepsis related to the bedsore.

$5.021 Million Verdict (Chesterfield County Circuit Court 2025):  You do not usually see big verdict in dental malpractice cases because the injuries are not severe.  That was not a problem in this case. The patient underwent prolonged dental surgery under general anesthesia. The plaintiff alleged she had moderate risk factors for deep vein thrombosis, including obesity and oral contraceptive use, but was not provided with sequential compression devices. Immediately after surgery, she decompensated after being assisted into her husband’s car. She died despite CPR and emergency transport. Autopsy found multiple pulmonary emboli. Plaintiff experts testified the embolism likely developed intraoperatively and that compression devices would have prevented the clot. Defense experts argued she was low risk, prophylaxis was not required, and the embolism likely existed before surgery, citing microscopic findings consistent with an older clot. The jury returned a $5.021 million verdict after about six hours of deliberation.

$6 Million Verdict (Hanover County 2025): A motorcyclist was traveling northbound on Route 1 in Ashland when the defendant, traveling southbound, failed to yield on a flashing yellow arrow and turned left onto England Street into the motorcycle. The plaintiff suffered severe left leg injuries, including open femur fractures, tibia fractures, heel bone fractures, and ruptured tendons and ligaments. Seventeen days after the crash, he underwent a below-the-knee amputation after unsuccessful efforts to save the leg. Before trial, three underinsured motorist policies paid $90,000, and the defendant’s liability limits were $50,000. The defense argued contributory negligence based on the traffic camera video. The court ruled the defendant was negligent as a matter of law and struck contributory negligence, sending only damages to the jury. The jury returned a $6 million verdict after about 30 minutes of deliberation.

3,460,223.86 Verdict (Spotsylvania County 2025): The defendant ran a red light on Route 3 and T boned the plaintiff’s vehicle, pushing it more than 100 feet across the intersection and onto a curb. The plaintiff suffered fractures at C5 and C6 and a vertebral artery dissection, leading to permanent neck pain and hand numbness. Liability was not disputed. He initially received a whiplash diagnosis, but later imaging showed fractures and the dissection. He wore a hard collar for seven months. After that, there was a three-year gap in treatment before he returned to pain management. Claimed future medical care exceeded $1.49 million and claimed lost earning capacity was $840,000. The defense emphasized the treatment gap and challenged the severity of ongoing complaints. The jury returned a verdict of $3,460,223.86, described as the claimed economic damages plus $1 million.

$875,000 Settlement (W.D. Virginia 2025): A pregnant woman from Tazewell County went to Clinch Valley Medical Center at approximately 31 weeks gestation with symptoms including high blood sugar, nausea, and back pain. The lawsuit alleged that the treating physician failed to diagnose and properly treat diabetic ketoacidosis, a life-threatening condition that can occur during pregnancy. The woman was discharged and returned the next day to a different hospital, where diabetic ketoacidosis was diagnosed within hours. By that time, ultrasound confirmed that her unborn son had died and he was later delivered by Cesarean section. The wrongful death claim alleged the failure to timely diagnose and treat the condition caused the fetal death. The case resolved before trial for $875,000, with proceeds allocated to the mother and her minor children.

$550,000 Settlement (Norfolk 2024): The plaintiff went to Africa on a trip for work and advised his doctor. The plaintiff claimed the physician failed to properly document his chart so that subsequent doctors he saw would easily know he had traveled to Africa and been prescribed an anti-malaria prophylactic. approximately two months after he returned from Africa, he presented to the defendant with complaints of chills, night sweats, shaking, headache, and bladder pain. He said the physician he saw at that time failed to consider a diagnosis of malaria and failed to order appropriate lab work to determine if he had an infection, including malaria. He died a few weeks later from cerebral malaria.

$3,333,000 Settlement (Norfolk 2024): The decedent was a passenger in a vehicle that was involved in a collision with an Amazon delivery vehicle. The decedent’s host vehicle was traveling toward an intersection when the Amazon truck, which was stopped at a stop sign, pulled into the intersection and struck the host vehicle on its passenger side. The decedent died from her injuries in the accident. Amazon paid $3 million of the settlement and an additional $333,000 was paid by its logistics subcontractor.

$950,000 Verdict (Norfolk 2024): The decedent, an individual with mental disabilities, was a passenger in a taxi when it was involved in an accident caused when another vehicle ran a stop sign at an intersection. The decedent suffered fatal injuries in the accident and his family brought a wrongful death lawsuit against both the taxi company and the other driver.

$225,000 Settlement (Hanover County 2023):  A woman in her late 30s suffered lower back injuries in a rear-end collision. She had previously undergone a discectomy for a left-sided L5-S1 disc herniation. The collision caused severe right-sided lower back and leg pain. MRIs revealed a new, significant right-sided L5-S1 disc herniation. Despite an L5-S1 laminectomy, her pain persisted, necessitating a lumbar spinal fusion due to a nearly complete L5-S1 disc space collapse. She fully recovered after the fusion surgery.  Often, in auto tort cases, the plaintiff is limited by the available insurance policies, and that is what we have here. The at-fault driver’s insurance was $25,000 and, because Virginia has stacking, she was also able to tap into her full $200,000 policy.

$500,000 Settlement (Richmond 2024): While driving, the plaintiff was struck by another vehicle. Although the impact was not severe, he began experiencing headaches and other symptoms indicative of a mild traumatic brain injury soon after the accident. These symptoms included vision problems, irritability, and difficulty concentrating, which significantly impacted his job as a banker. His condition persisted for nearly two years, during which he saw some improvement but continued to suffer occasional headaches and fatigue.  The settlement comprised the limits of $300,000 from the defendant’s insurer and an additional $200,000 from the plaintiff’s underinsured motorist (UIM) carrier. No other coverage was available. The plaintiff’s medical bills amounted to $21,509.53.

$3,250,00 Settlement (Fairfax 2024): A tragic incident occurred on a Virginia construction site when a 16-year-old summer laborer died due to a trench collapse. Prior to the accident, an erosion inspector from Fairfax County had warned that the trench was dangerously deep and lacked the necessary shoring. Ignoring these warnings, the construction manager directed the teenager to work within the unstable trench. Following this preventable tragedy, the deceased’s estate brought a wrongful death claim against both the construction company and its manager for negligence, as well as the property owner for failing to ensure safe working conditions.

$855,685 Verdict (Gainesville 2024):  A man was driving on Interstate 66 West near Gainesville when his vehicle was rear-ended by a tractor-trailer. He sustained multiple fractures, including 11 rib fractures, a compression fracture of the T6 vertebra, and fractures of the left orbital bone, right hip, left scapula, and left humeral head. He also suffered a left pneumothorax and a head laceration.

 $5,000,000 Settlement (Norfolk 2023): A 54-year-old man, having recently recovered from cancer, was hit by a city-owned car while crossing the street in a marked crosswalk. Despite initially declining medical attention, he later presented with symptoms consistent with a mild traumatic brain injury and developed chronic depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. He was diagnosed with secondary post-traumatic hydrocephalus and had a shunt surgically inserted. Additionally, he suffered from severe growth hormone deficiency and post-traumatic hypersomnia. The case settled for $5 million in mediation before trial.

$3,500,000 Settlement (Richmond 2023): Plaintiff A.P.G., approximately six-weeks-old, was reportedly placed by his father in an inclined sleeper that was a component of the Ultra-Lite Day and Night Play Yard. A.P.G.’s father allegedly used the harness and connected straps of the play yard in accordance with the instructions but later discovered the sleeper had collapsed and A.P.G. had fallen to the bottom of the play yard. The plaintiff reportedly suffered a brain injury, seizures and spasticity, cardiac arrest, and multi-organ dysfunction. The plaintiff contended the play yard contained a design defect.

$300,000 Settlement (Bedford County 2023): The decedent was reportedly a passenger in an eastbound vehicle driven by her husband when a southbound vehicle operated by defendant failed to yield the right-of-way at an intersection controlled by a stop sign, causing a collision. Decedent died form injuries sustained in the accident after a month in the hospital. This was probably a policy limits settlement, which is why it was not higher.

$3,500,000 Verdict (Federal Court 2023): The plaintiff was a passenger in a vehicle that was headed south on an interstate at the same time a truck owned and/or operated by defendant Leonard’s Express Inc. was headed south in an adjacent lane. The plaintiff said the truck driver tried to maneuver into her lane, behind her vehicle, but there was not enough space, and the truck made contact with the rear of her vehicle, causing her to lose control, veer off the interstate and flip over. The plaintiff allegedly suffered injuries that included a traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder.

$400,000 Verdict (Roanoke County 2023): A 77-year-old woman went to Roanoke Memorial Hospital and underwent procedures including a cardiac catheterization as part of her treatment. She died, allegedly due to a massive retroperitoneal hemorrhage, having lost three liters of blood, resulting in fatal hypovolemic shock subsequent to her catheterization procedure. Wrongful death lawsuit was filed against the hospital. The settlement value of this was probably lower because the decedent was older and may have been in poor health to begin with.

$200,000 Settlement (Campbell County 2023): An elderly nursing home resident at the Elms of Lynchburg fell and eventually died from injuries related to his fall. His estate filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the nursing home for negligently failing to prevent him from falling.

$186,312 Verdict (Norfolk 2022): was reportedly driving his automobile near an intersection when it collided with a vehicle operated by defendant. The plaintiff said he suffered personal injuries due to the collision. The plaintiff said the defendant’s negligent driving, which included failing to maintain proper control over his vehicle, failing to yield the right-of-way and driving at an excessive speed, caused the collision.

Contact Us About Virginia Injury Lawsuits

If you have a personal injury lawsuit in Virginia we can help get you the maximum compensation. Contact us today at 800-553-8082 or contact us online for a free case evaluation.