Georgia Medical Malpractice Law and Settlements

This page will look at the general laws and procedural rules that apply to medical malpractice lawsuits in Georgia, so you understand how your case might proceed.

Georgia is a large state, and Atlanta is one of the biggest metropolitan areas in the entire country. So Georgia has a very active malpractice lawsuit docket. We look at what makes a solid claim and medical malpractice settlement amounts in Georgia and how they are calculated.

Reach out to our malpractice lawyers today for a free, no-obligation consultation about your medical malpractice lawsuits in Georgia. Call us at 800-553-8082 or get a free online consultation.

Settlement Value of Georgia Medical Malpractice Cases

Medical malpractice cases have a higher average settlement value than other injury cases. Nationally, the average settlement payout for medical malpractice claims is around $300,000 to $380,000. The median settlement payout in medical malpractice cases is $250,000 to $285,000. For malpractice lawsuits against healthcare providers that go to trial and win, the average jury verdict nationally is just over $1 million.

Georgia Medical Malpractice Verdicts & Settlements

Calculating settlement amounts and jury awards in Georgia medical malpractice lawsuits is not an exact science. Several key factors come into play when determining the value of a case. The first is the strength of the claim. It always starts there. The severity of the injuries and the extent of the damages suffered are, of course, huge driving factors.

This includes medical expenses, lost wages, and future costs related to ongoing treatment or rehabilitation. Another crucial element is the age of the victim. In malpractice cases, younger victims often receive higher compensation because the impact of the injury is projected over a longer period.

Jury awards and settlements are heavily influenced by intangible factors like pain and suffering. One compelling story can sway an entire case, and sometimes you do not know until it is over what drove the decision. Emotions count whether the decision-maker is an insurance adjuster or a jury.

Also, keep in mind this is not a random sampling of verdicts. We are cherry-picking the winners and stepping over a lot of defense verdicts to create this list.

Below are verdicts and settlements from recent Georgia medical malpractice cases won in Georgia:

• $42,000,000 Verdict and $11,800,000 Attorney Fee Award Affirmed (Georgia 2026): A 27-year-old woman died after delivering her daughter by C-section. She suffered placenta accreta spectrum, a massive hemorrhage, and an emergency hysterectomy. Her condition deteriorated after she was transferred to intensive care, and she died the following morning. The lawsuit alleged that the doctor responsible for her ICU care failed to secure additional IV access, properly administer fluids and blood products, monitor serious electrolyte abnormalities, and recognize that she needed to return to surgery. The jury awarded $10 million for the woman’s pain and suffering and $32 million for wrongful death. On June 16, 2026, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed the judgment, rejected application of the old $350,000 damages cap, and upheld approximately $11.8 million in attorney fees after the defendants rejected a $3 million settlement offer.
• $33,465,176 Verdict Cap Reduction Vacated (Georgia 2026): A woman died after her bowel was perforated during surgery to remove an ovarian cyst. Her husband and daughter alleged that the doctors providing postoperative care failed to recognize and properly treat the resulting complications. A jury awarded $29.25 million for the full value of her life, $2.5 million for conscious pain and suffering, and $1,715,176 in medical expenses. The trial court reduced the wrongful death award to $350,000 under Georgia’s old medical malpractice cap. On June 16, 2026, the Georgia Supreme Court vacated that reduction because the cap could not constitutionally be applied to the combined verdict. The case was remanded for the trial court to consider a separate defense argument that the award was excessive.
• $8,300,000 Verdict (Georgia 2026): A woman underwent knee replacement surgery and was later found unresponsive in recovery after her CPAP mask had allegedly been removed following narcotic pain treatment. She suffered severe injuries as a result and brought a medical malpractice claim based on the postoperative care she received. A jury awarded $8.3 million, consisting of $6.5 million in compensatory damages and $1.8 million in attorney fees. In 2026, the Georgia Supreme Court declined to review the case, leaving the verdict in place.
• $47,000,000 Verdict and $23,500,000 Judgment (Georgia 2026 Update): A woman developed a severe infection that allegedly went untreated long enough to require amputation of an arm and a leg. She brought medical malpractice and negligent credentialing claims against Union General Hospital. A jury awarded $47 million and assigned 50% of the fault to the hospital, resulting in a $23.5 million judgment plus interest and costs. In March 2026, the Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed the hospital’s appeal as premature because the trial court had not yet determined the amount of attorney fees. The dismissal did not decide the merits of the appeal.
• $70,000,000 Verdict (Georgia 2025): A woman was treated for sepsis and shock at an Albany hospital, where she was allegedly given a vasopressin overdose that continued for more than 40 hours without being caught. By the time the mistake was recognized, blood flow to her legs had been cut off, and both legs had to be amputated above the knee. She brought a medical malpractice lawsuit against three doctors and their medical practices, claiming the overdose and the delay in recognizing it caused catastrophic permanent injuries. A Dougherty County jury awarded $70 million in damages.
• $48,000,000 Verdict (Georgia 2025): A man went to a dermatologist with recurrent skin cancer near his ear, but the cancer was allegedly not properly diagnosed and treated, allowing it to spread and cause devastating damage. The progression of the disease reportedly left him permanently disfigured, costing him most of one ear, his teeth, and salivary glands, along with other major complications. He and his wife filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against the dermatologist. A Fulton County jury awarded $48 million, including $32 million for the patient’s pain and suffering and $16 million on his wife’s related claim. The court later entered a judgment of approximately $56.8 million after adding interest. The defendants reportedly intended to challenge the judgment.
• $25,000,000 Verdict (Georgia 2025): A pregnant woman with severe preeclampsia was allegedly discharged without proper monitoring or treatment, and critical communication failures allowed her condition to worsen. She later returned with severe complications, and her baby died before delivery. The family filed a medical malpractice wrongful death lawsuit, alleging that the doctors failed to timely diagnose and manage the mother’s condition. A Bibb County jury awarded $25 million, including $4 million for the economic value of the child’s life and $15 million for the intangible value of the child’s life.
• $18,300,000 Verdict (Georgia 2025): A 64-year-old man underwent elective colon surgery without proper cardiac clearance and later died from organ failure caused by cardiogenic shock. His estate alleged that his cardiologist failed to communicate critical heart test results and that his surgeon moved forward with the procedure despite warning signs of serious heart disease. The lawsuit also claimed the medical groups failed to maintain proper systems for communication, clearance, and patient safety. A Gwinnett County jury awarded $18.3 million, including $1.7 million for medical bills, $12 million for the decedent’s pain and suffering, and $4.6 million for wrongful death damages, with fault apportioned 70% to the cardiology defendants and 30% to the surgical defendants.
• $8,500,000 Verdict (Georgia 2024): A federal judge awarded $8.5 million to a patient who developed severe complications after a primary care physician failed to timely diagnose and refer him for emergency treatment of appendicitis. The lawsuit claimed the doctor did not order urgent imaging or refer the patient to the ER despite clear signs of a medical emergency, leading to a ruptured appendix and life-threatening infections, including necrotizing fasciitis. The patient was left with permanent damage, requiring a colostomy bag and ongoing care. The judge awarded $1.58 million for past medical expenses, $2.33 million for past pain and suffering, and $4.66 million for future pain and suffering, noting the significant impact on the patient’s quality of life.
• $38,600,000 Verdict (2024 Georgia): In a medical malpractice lawsuit filed against Emory Healthcare, the issue revolved around the death of an 18-year-old patient following a heart transplant surgery. The central claim was the medical team’s failure to conduct a crucial chest CT scan after the installation of a heart pump in the patient a year before the transplant. This oversight led to a significant complication during the transplant procedure. During the surgery, the patient suffered massive bleeding due to a laceration to the outflow graft of the heart pump. The legal team for the plaintiff argued that this complication, which ultimately led to the patient’s death, was a direct result of Emory Healthcare’s negligence in not performing the necessary imaging study. They contended that if the scan had been conducted, it would have revealed the heart pump’s outflow graft adhered to the chest, allowing for preventive measures. The defense argued that the patient’s death was due to primary graft failure, a known risk in heart transplant surgeries unrelated to the surgery’s complications. That defense did not carry the day. A DeKalb County jury awarded $38.6 million in damages. The hospital agreed in 2024 to settle the claim without an appeal. The settlement terms are confidential, but malpractice lawyers are typically willing to allow a significant haircut on the verdict to avoid an appeal.
• $9,200,000 Verdict (2024 Georgia): A man underwent surgery at the Medical Center of Central Georgia to remove a polyp from his intestine. During the operation, the surgeons unexpectedly discovered a cancerous mass and decided to remove it immediately. In the process, they accidentally cut a “large pulsing vessel,” later identified as the superior mesenteric artery, a critical blood vessel supplying the intestines. Following the surgery, the man suffered severe complications due to the severed artery and eventually died. The man’s daughter filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the medical center, arguing that the doctors should have performed a CT scan before the surgery. Her expert testified that the scan would have revealed the unusual location of the superior mesenteric artery and allowed the surgeons to avoid cutting it. The jury awarded $9.2 million, including $7.2 million in noneconomic damages. The medical center appealed, challenging the evidence and arguing that Georgia’s $350,000 cap applied to the wrongful death damages. The Georgia Court of Appeals upheld the verdict, but the Georgia Supreme Court vacated that decision in 2025 and remanded the case for a different constitutional analysis. The Supreme Court did not decide whether the cap could apply to an isolated wrongful death award. The $9.2 million figure is the jury verdict, but the page should not describe the entire amount as finally collectible while the cap and post-trial issues remain unresolved.
• $16,000,000 Verdict (2023 Georgia): A doctor who prescribed an antidepressant known to increase suicidal tendencies, especially when mixed with alcohol. The suit claimed the doctor failed to warn the patient of these risks and did not provide adequate monitoring. The jury found the doctor primarily at fault for the death, holding him 51% responsible, resulting in an $8.36 million payout to the family after the fault allocation.
• $10,000,000 Verdict (2023 Georgia): A 68-year-old retired pediatric ICU nurse was admitted to Atlanta’s Piedmont Hospital with suspected bronchitis. She was mistakenly administered a feeding tube into her trachea instead of the esophagus by a nurse, leading to a punctured lung. Her Atlanta malpractice lawsuit alleges that this error went unrecognized, and a radiologist’s subsequent misreading of an X-ray resulted in a further delay in identifying the mistake. The patient eventually suffocated, fell into a coma, and, tragically, did not recover. At trial, the family’s lawyers contended that had the nurse followed the hospital’s policies correctly, the misplacement could have been detected and corrected in time. An Atlanta jury awarded the family $10 million.
• $30,000,000 Verdict (2023 Georgia): A 35-year-old hospice worker with gestational diabetes and preeclampsia was admitted to Clearview Regional Medical Center in Monroe for induced labor. After receiving an epidural, complications arose when the fetal heart monitor was displaced, making the unborn child’s heart rate untraceable. By the time the medical team intervened, the mother experienced an amniotic fluid embolism, requiring her resuscitation and subsequent hysterectomy. Her daughter was born with a severe brain injury due to oxygen deprivation. The family filed a lawsuit against the hospital and involved staff, alleging negligence contributed to these outcomes. They emphasized the mother’s continuous contractions and delayed medical responses as critical factors. The defense countered that an unpredictable amniotic fluid embolism was the primary cause. Ultimately, the jury assigned 80% liability to one healthcare entity and 20% to the attending doctor, granting substantial damages for both the mother and child.
• $10,500,000 Verdict (2023 Georgia): A symptomatic pregnant woman visited a regional healthcare facility. Despite an evaluation from a medical professional, she was sent home untreated. Tragically, her return to the hospital the following day led to the stillbirth of her twins. The woman hired an Atlanta medical malpractice lawyer to pursue a wrongful death lawsuit against the healthcare providers and their respective institutions for the premature deaths of her unborn children. The trial concluded with the jury assigning a value of $5.25 million for each child’s life.
• $4,360,000 Verdict (2023 Georgia): A well-known singer from Athens tragically died following a simple diagnostic heart procedure at St. Mary’s Hospital. The family’s cardiac malpractice wrongful death lawsuit alleged the cardiologist who conducted the procedure inflicted a tear in Molina’s left ventricle wall during cardiac catheterization and failed to adequately address the severity of this complication. The jury awarded $4.36 million in damage after three days of deliberation.
• $5,000,000 Verdict (2022 Georgia): Plaintiff suffered acute hypoxic and hypercapnic respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome with the need for intubation, acute kidney injury, aspiration pneumonia, septic shock, and rhabdomyolysis after anesthesia was administered. He suffered speech and cognitive impairments as a result. The lawsuit alleged that the defendants were negligent in administering the anesthesia.
• $15,319,500 Verdict (2022 Georgia): A nursing home was accused of medical negligence in allowing the death of a 77-year-old resident from a sepsis infection that developed from untreated bedsores.
• $2,350,000 Verdict (2021 Georgia): A 74-year-old woman died after doctors at the defendant Emory Clinic negligently intubated her for a prior surgical procedure, then negligently failed to report and communicate findings of the injury caused by the botched intubation afterward. A jury in DeKalb County awarded $2.3 million in damages.
• $2,100,000 Settlement (2020 Georgia): The lawsuit alleged that the doctors and hospital were negligent in failing to timely diagnose and treat a woman’s cancer. Specifically, the defendants failed to properly interpret and respond to abnormal pap smear results, which would have led to a timely diagnosis of cancer.
• $4,700,000 Verdict (2018 Georgia): An adult woman died of liver failure due to mixed hepatocellular and cholestatic injury induced by the drug Ketoconazole, which had been prescribed for the decedent to treat nail fungus by the family practitioner. Her family hired a Georgia medical malpractice lawyer to bring a lawsuit claiming that the defendant failed to comply with the applicable standard of care by prescribing Ketoconazole to the decedent for 19 weeks without properly monitoring her liver function during that time.
• $20,509,284 Verdict (2016 Georgia): A 25-year-old mentally disabled male with a history of cardiomyopathy and orthopnea died of sudden cardiac death due to cardiomyopathy while undergoing a sleep study at a sleep center run by the defendant Emory University Hospital. His family hired an Atlanta malpractice attorney who filed a suit that alleged that the defendant was negligent in failing to respond promptly to signs of distress.

Can you use these cases to find the average malpractice settlement in Georgia or the appropriate settlement payout in your case? No. Example lawsuits are just one piece of the puzzle of calculating a settlement payout in a malpractice lawsuit in Georgia.

Georgia Medical Malpractice Laws

Below is a summary of Georgia’s key laws and procedural rules for medical malpractice cases.

What is Medical Malpractice in Georgia?

Under Georgia law, medical malpractice occurs when a licensed healthcare provider renders negligent or inappropriate medical care that injures the patient. Unlike many other types of professional negligence, medical malpractice usually results in dire, life-altering consequences.

When medical negligence causes physical harm or death, it cannot be undone. However, our civil justice system allows victims of medical malpractice to get financial compensation for the harm they suffered.

Proving Medical Malpractice in Georgia

To prove medical malpractice in a Georgia lawsuit, a plaintiff needs to prove three basic elements:

1. the duty inherent in the doctor-patient relationship;
2. the breach of that duty by failing to exercise the requisite degree of skill and care, and
3. that the failure be the proximate cause of the injury sustained.

Proving these elements is a complex and expensive process. The plaintiff needs other doctors or healthcare providers to agree to act as expert witnesses. Getting an opinion from another doctor that your case is valid is just the first step and does not guarantee success. The defendants will present their experts, who will say that the doctors did nothing wrong and that your claims have no merit.

Georgia medical malpractice lawyers need to make sure that the jury understands that the burden of proof in a malpractice case is based on a preponderance of the evidence, which is different from the higher beyond a reasonable doubt standard used in criminal cases. The Supreme Court of Georgia has clarified that “preponderance of the evidence” means the plaintiff must show it is more likely than not that the defendant’s actions caused the injury. Georgia malpractice attorneys for victim must ensure jurors grasp this concept to avoid confusion with the criminal standard of proof.

Medical Malpractice Jury Instruction

This is the jury instruction the Georgia Supreme Court wants to see in medical malpractice cases in Georgia:

For the plaintiff to show that the defendant’s alleged negligence was the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury, the plaintiff must present expert medical testimony.

An expert’s opinion on the issue of whether the defendant’s alleged negligence caused the plaintiff’s injury cannot be based on speculation or possibility. It must be based on reasonable medical probability or reasonable medical certainty.

If you find that the expert’s testimony regarding causation is not based on reasonable medical probability or reasonable medical certainty, then the plaintiff has not proven that the defendant’s alleged negligence proximately caused the plaintiff’s injury, and you would return a verdict for the defendant.

Do you find this confusing and slanted towards the defendant? Three justices on the Georgia Supreme Court agree with you.

Georgia Statute of Limitations for Medical Malpractice Cases

If you are considering a medical malpractice lawsuit in Georgia, you need to be aware of the statute of limitations, which sets a strict deadline on how long plaintiffs can wait before filing a claim. Georgia has a 2-year statute of limitations for medical malpractice claims. Ga. Code § 9-3-71.

Under this statute, a medical malpractice case must generally be filed within two years after the injury or death arising from the negligent act or omission. O.C.G.A. § 9-3-71(a). Georgia does not recognize a broad discovery rule that automatically gives a patient two years from the date the patient learns that malpractice occurred. The clock can begin before the patient understands the medical cause of the injury. The same two-year period applies to wrongful death claims based on medical malpractice.

In Georgia, statutes of limitation are generally paused for individuals who are legally incompetent due to intellectual disability or mental illness (O.C.G.A. § 9-3-90(a); O.C.G.A. § 9-3-91). Unfortunately, O.C.G.A. § 9-3-73(b) eliminates these tolling provisions for mentally incompetent plaintiffs in medical malpractice cases, meaning that the statute of limitations continues to run even if the plaintiff is mentally incapacitated. This terribly unfair law creates a significant barrier for some of the most vulnerable individuals seeking justice for medical malpractice claims.

Statute of Limitations on Misdiagnosis Claims

Georgia courts recognize a narrow “new injury” rule in some failure-to-diagnose cases. If a negligent failure to diagnose allows a later and genuinely different injury to develop, such as cancer progressing from a localized and treatable stage to metastatic disease after a relatively symptom-free period, the later condition may qualify as a new injury.

When that rule applies, the statute may begin when symptoms of the new injury first appear. It does not begin when the patient finally discovers that the doctor was negligent or learns the causal connection. This exception is fact-specific and narrow. A patient should never assume it will rescue an otherwise late claim.

Georgia 5-Year Statute of Repose for Medical Malpractice

Georgia also has a 5-year statute of repose that applies to medical malpractice lawsuits. OCGA § 9-3-71 (b) tells us this is an absolute maximum deadline that applies over and above the 2-year statute of limitations.

So under the statute of repose, most malpractice claims must be filed within five years of the negligent act or omission, regardless of when the injury was discovered. Georgia has separate rules for young children and for qualifying foreign objects left in a patient’s body.

Statute of Limitations for Georgia Birth Injury Cases

Georgia has special deadlines for malpractice cases involving children. This is most often relevant in Georgia birth injury cases. If the negligent act occurred before the child turned five, the child ordinarily has two years from the fifth birthday to file, which makes the seventh birthday the usual limitations deadline.

Georgia also imposes a separate repose deadline. If the malpractice occurred before age five, no medical malpractice action may be filed after the child’s tenth birthday. The tenth birthday is an outside deadline, not an automatic extension based on late discovery. If the child was already five or older when the malpractice occurred, the ordinary five-year repose period generally applies.

These deadlines are far narrower than the rules in many states, which may preserve a minor’s claim until adulthood. A birth-related neurological or cognitive injury may take years to understand, but Georgia law does not necessarily wait for the full extent of the damage to become clear. The safest course is to have a Georgia medical malpractice lawyer investigate the deadline immediately.

Expert Affidavit Required for Georgia Medical Malpractice Cases

Under Georgia law (Ga. Code § 9-11-9.1), a medical malpractice complaint must ordinarily be supported by an affidavit from a qualified expert. The affidavit must identify at least one negligent act or omission and provide the factual basis for that opinion. Failure to file the required affidavit can result in dismissal.

There is a narrow exception when the filing deadline will expire within ten days, the law firm was retained fewer than 90 days before the deadline, and counsel files the required attorney affidavit. In that situation, the plaintiff may have 45 days after filing the complaint to submit the expert affidavit. A plaintiff may also have 30 days to cure a timely filed but defective affidavit after a proper defense challenge. These rules are technical, and a lawyer should not rely on either procedure unless the statutory requirements are satisfied.

An expert does not always have to share the defendant’s exact board certification. The controlling questions are whether the expert is a member of the appropriate profession and has actual professional knowledge and experience in the procedure, diagnosis, or treatment at issue.

Georgia law, specifically O.C.G.A. § 24-7-702(c), generally requires the expert to have been properly licensed when the alleged act occurred and to have actively practiced or taught in the relevant area for at least three of the preceding five years. The expert must usually be a member of the same profession as the defendant. A physician may, in certain circumstances, testify about the standard of care for a nurse, nurse practitioner, physician assistant, or another provider whom the physician supervised or taught.

Georgia courts have made clear that a qualified expert need not have an identical job title. But Georgia still has a lot of hoops to jump through before an expert may testify in a medical malpractice case.

Emergency Room Malpractice Law in Georgia

Our malpractice lawyers believe Georgia goes overboard in protecting emergency room doctors. Under OCGA § 51-1-29.5 (c), medical malpractice arising from emergency medical care provided in a hospital’s emergency department, obstetrical unit, or a surgical suite following emergency treatment, a physician or health care provider can only be held liable if it’s proven with clear and convincing evidence that their actions constituted gross negligence.

This law establishes a demanding liability standard for plaintiffs in qualifying emergency medical care cases. It does not apply merely because treatment occurred somewhere inside an emergency department or obstetrical unit. The claim must arise from emergency medical care as the statute defines that term. When the statute applies, the plaintiff must prove gross negligence by clear and convincing evidence instead of proving ordinary professional negligence by a preponderance of the evidence. Our lawyers believe the ordinary standard of care already gives doctors appropriate room to make difficult decisions during a genuine emergency. Georgia did not need to make an injured patient’s burden this much harder.

No Cap on Damages in Georgia Malpractice Cases

The Georgia legislature previously passed a law imposing a maximum cap on the amount of non-economic (pain & suffering) damages that could be awarded in medical malpractice cases. In 2010, however, the Georgia Supreme Court struck down that law because it violated the state constitution. (See Atlanta Oculoplastic Surgery, P.C. v. Nestlehutt, 691 S.E.2d 218 (2010)) As a result, there is currently no cap limiting the amount of pain and suffering damages for medical malpractice cases in Georgia. Georgia courts are also thankfully not quick to disturb large jury verdicts in medical malpractice lawsuits.

The Georgia Supreme Court revisited the issue in 2026 and left the core rule intact. In Clark v. Leigh, decided June 16, 2026, the court reaffirmed Nestlehutt and held that the $350,000 cap could not be applied to a verdict that included pain and suffering damages protected by the constitutional right to a jury trial. The court vacated an order that had reduced a $29.25 million wrongful death award to $350,000.

The court reached the same practical result in Cayamcela v. Advocacy Trust, affirming a $42 million malpractice verdict that included $10 million for the decedent’s pain and suffering and $32 million for wrongful death. These decisions preserve Georgia’s rule against applying the old cap to pain and suffering, loss of consortium, and verdicts containing those protected damages. The court did not decide whether a cap could constitutionally apply to a verdict containing only wrongful death damages, so the page should not claim that every possible wrongful death cap question has been resolved.

Georgia Follows Modified Comparative Fault

In medical malpractice cases in which the plaintiff’s own negligence is partly to blame for their injuries, Georgia courts apply the legal rule known as modified comparative fault. Under comparative fault, a plaintiff’s damages are reduced by their percentage share of fault. So if a plaintiff is found to be 10% at fault for their own injuries, their damages would be reduced by 10%.

Under the modified version of comparative fault adopted in Georgia, a plaintiff who is 50% or more at fault is barred from recovering damages. A plaintiff who is less than 50% at fault may recover, but the award is reduced by the plaintiff’s percentage of responsibility.

Damages Available in Georgia Medical Malpractice Cases

When pursuing a medical malpractice claim in Georgia, plaintiffs can seek various types of damages. These damages are intended to compensate the injured party for the losses they have suffered due to medical negligence. The primary categories of damages available in Georgia medical malpractice cases include:

Economic Damages

Economic damages cover the quantifiable financial losses incurred as a result of the malpractice. These include:

• Medical Expenses: Compensation for past, present, and future medical costs related to the injury, including hospital bills, surgery costs, rehabilitation, and any necessary ongoing medical care. In birth injury lawsuits in Georgia, this number can quickly add up to tens of millions of dollars.
• Lost Wages: Reimbursement for income lost due to the inability to work while recovering from the injury, as well as compensation for diminished earning capacity if the injury affects the plaintiff’s ability to work in the future.
• Other Out-of-Pocket Expenses: This may include costs for medical devices, transportation to and from medical appointments, and modifications to the home or vehicle to accommodate a disability.

2. Non-Economic Damages

Non-economic damages compensate for more subjective, non-monetary losses, such as:

• Pain and Suffering: Compensation for the physical pain and emotional suffering endured as a result of the injury.
• Loss of Consortium: Damages that may be awarded to a spouse for the loss of companionship, affection, and services caused by the victim’s injury.
• Mental Anguish: Compensation for the psychological impact of the injury, including anxiety, depression, and loss of enjoyment of life.

Wrongful Death Damages

If medical malpractice results in a patient’s death, the appropriate surviving family member may file a wrongful death claim for the full value of the decedent’s life. The estate may bring separate claims for losses belonging to the decedent or the estate. Recoverable damages may include:

• The Full Value of the Deceased’s Life: This includes both economic contributions, such as lost wages and benefits, and non-economic aspects, such as the loss of care, companionship, and guidance.
• Funeral and Burial Expenses: The estate may recover reasonable funeral and burial costs.
• Medical Bills and Pre-Death Suffering: The estate may seek medical expenses caused by the malpractice and damages for the patient’s conscious pain and suffering before death.

Contact Our Law Firm About Georgia Medical Malpractice Lawsuits

Contact our malpractice lawyers today for a free consultation about potential medical malpractice lawsuits in Georgia. Call us at 800-553-8082 or get a free online consultation.

More Resources

• Georgia Personal Injury Law and Settlements
• Georgia Nursing Home Lawsuits