Delaware Sex Abuse Lawsuits

If you were the victim of sexual abuse or assault in Delaware, either as a child or an adult, you may have the right to bring a civil lawsuit against both your abuser and any school, company, or organization that might be liable for the abuse.

Delaware eliminated the statute of limitations for most childhood sexual abuse claims in 2007. But not every older claim survived that change, and adult survivors face a much shorter deadline. This page explains the Delaware statute of limitations for sex abuse lawsuits, who can be held responsible, and the potential settlement value of these cases.

If you or someone you love was sexually abused in Delaware, contact us today at 800-553-8082 or reach out to us online for a free, confidential case review.

Need support right now? The RAINN National Sexual Assault Hotline is available 24/7 at 800-656-4673.

Delaware Statute of Limitations for Sex Abuse Lawsuits

The short answer: In Delaware, a civil lawsuit based on sexual abuse of a minor by an adult can generally be filed at any time if the claim was still alive when the law changed in July 2007. Claims that had already expired before that date, and were not filed during the 2007 to 2009 revival window, are generally still barred. Adult survivors are usually subject to a two-year deadline.

Delaware took a significant step in 2007 by eliminating the statute of limitations for civil lawsuits involving child sex abuse. Recognizing that many victims of child sex abuse do not come forward until decades later, the legislature put Delaware ahead of most of the country.

What the 2007 Law Did

Under Delaware Code, Title 10, § 8145(a), a cause of action based on the sexual abuse of a minor by an adult may be filed in Superior Court at any time after the abuse. The statute does not limit these claims to lawsuits against the abuser. Schools, churches, youth organizations, and other institutions can also be defendants when the facts support it.

The law also opened a two-year revival window, beginning July 9, 2007, for survivors whose claims had already expired under the old statute of limitations. Claims against institutions filed during that window required a finding of gross negligence before damages could be awarded against the institution. That window closed in 2009.

Who Is Still Shut Out

Here is the gap that many survivors do not know about. If a childhood abuse claim had already expired under the old law before July 9, 2007, and the survivor did not file during the 2007 to 2009 window, Delaware law generally still bars that claim today.

A useful decision is Waterhouse v. Hollingsworth (Del. Super. Ct. 2013). The plaintiff alleged sexual abuse occurring over a period that included acts before and after the critical cutoff. The court held that claims involving assaults before July 9, 2005, were barred under the former two-year statute of limitations because those claims had already expired before the 2007 law took effect. Other alleged assaults within the relevant period were not dismissed on that basis.

That decision demonstrates why the precise dates of the abuse matter. Two people abused by the same perpetrator may have different filing rights because their claims accrued at different times.

That is also the gap the Delaware legislature considered closing in 2026 with House Bill 75, which would have revived previously expired claims. The bill did not become law. We discuss what happened in our news and updates below.

Adult Survivors of Sexual Assault

The 2007 law applies to the sexual abuse of minors. Civil claims for sexual assault suffered as an adult are generally governed by Delaware’s two-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims under § 8119. Different claims and circumstances can raise additional deadline questions. If you were assaulted as an adult, do not wait to talk to a lawyer about the deadline.

Other Key Statutes That May Impact Claims

• Criminal statute of limitations for child sex abuse: Delaware has removed the criminal prosecution deadline for a number of specified child sexual offenses. The applicable deadline depends on the particular offense and the law governing it. The criminal filing rules are separate from the deadlines for a civil lawsuit.
• Mandatory reporting laws: Under 16 Del. C. § 903, any person, agency, organization, or entity with knowledge or a good-faith suspicion of child abuse must report it to the Department in accordance with the statute. This obligation is broader than a requirement applying only to teachers, clergy members, and healthcare providers. A failure to report can be important evidence in a civil case against an institution, although it does not automatically establish civil liability.

Delaware Sex Abuse Cases Our Lawyers Are Reviewing

What Is Considered Sexual Abuse in Delaware?

Delaware law recognizes several forms of sexual abuse and assault, including unlawful sexual contact, sexual penetration, and sexual intercourse. In civil cases, sexual abuse or assault is often referred to as sexual battery, and it can encompass a range of misconduct, from unwanted groping to rape.

The Delaware Criminal Code distinguishes among these offenses based on the nature of the sexual conduct, the ages of the people involved, consent, and whether the accused occupied a position of trust or authority.

Two important considerations are:

• Intentional sexual contact: The nature of the touching and the intent behind it matter. If someone accidentally brushes against another person in a crowded space, that is different from intentional sexual touching for an unlawful purpose.
• Consent: Sexual contact without consent can constitute a criminal offense and support a civil lawsuit. When a minor is involved, Delaware imposes additional restrictions based on the child’s age, the accused person’s age, and any relationship of trust, authority, or supervision.

One important distinction is that Delaware does not treat every sexual interaction involving someone under 18 in exactly the same way. The criminal code contains specific age-based provisions, including restrictions on sexual intercourse with a 16- or 17-year-old by someone who is 30 or older.

Delaware also has specific laws addressing sexual abuse by people in positions of trust, authority, or supervision. For example, sexual intercourse between a teacher and a 16-year-old student can constitute a serious criminal offense even where the student claims the relationship was consensual. The teacher’s authority over the child is a critical part of the legal analysis.

These distinctions matter in civil lawsuits because § 8145 ties childhood sexual abuse claims to conduct that would constitute a criminal offense under Delaware law.

Holding Third Parties Liable for Sexual Abuse in Delaware

The abuser is often the primary defendant in a sexual abuse lawsuit. But from a practical standpoint, suing the abuser alone may not provide meaningful financial recovery. Many perpetrators lack the resources to pay a settlement or jury award, and some may be deceased or incarcerated.

That does not mean a lawsuit against an individual abuser is necessarily pointless. Individual liability can matter, particularly when the perpetrator has assets or when the lawsuit helps establish responsibility for the abuse. Still, the real path to financial recovery for many survivors lies in holding institutions accountable.

Schools, churches, youth organizations, corporations, and other entities that failed to prevent abuse or actively covered it up can be sued when the facts establish a legal basis for liability.

When institutions turn a blind eye to abuse, they must be held accountable. Survivors deserve justice, not just from their abusers but also from the organizations that failed to protect them.

Under Delaware law, organizations such as schools, religious institutions, youth programs, sports leagues, and corporations may face negligence claims when they had a duty to protect someone from a foreseeable risk of abuse and failed to meet that duty.

Evidence supporting a claim against an institution may show that it:

• Knew or should have known about the risk of abuse, based on prior complaints, warning signs, or information that should have prompted further investigation.
• Failed to take reasonable steps to prevent abuse, such as ignoring reports, providing inadequate supervision, or allowing known offenders continued access to children.
• Concealed or mishandled allegations, including failing to report suspected abuse, intimidating victims, or quietly transferring abusers to avoid scrutiny.

One important distinction in civil sex abuse cases is the lower burden of proof compared to criminal trials. While prosecutors must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in criminal court, civil plaintiffs generally must prove their claims by a preponderance of the evidence. This means a civil lawsuit may succeed even if the abuser was never criminally convicted.

Ordinary Negligence, Gross Negligence, and Institutional Liability

The gross negligence requirement in § 8145(b) applied to institutional claims revived during the 2007 to 2009 window. The statute does not impose that same special requirement on every timely claim brought under § 8145(a).

That matters because proving ordinary negligence generally requires less than proving gross negligence. But the applicable standard still depends on the defendant, the particular claim, and any immunity protections. If a school, church, or youth program had prior complaints about an abuser and failed to act, survivors with strong evidence of institutional failure should investigate whether those entities can be held liable.

Delaware Courts Have Addressed Institutional Immunity

A recent Delaware decision demonstrates how important the identity of the defendant can be. In Liebal v. Belvedere Fire Company (Del. Super. Ct. March 5, 2025), a family alleged that a volunteer fire company and its leadership failed to protect a 15-year-old girl from sexual abuse by a deputy fire chief.

The court dismissed the fire company itself based on governmental immunity. It also recognized immunity for directors acting in their official capacities. But the court allowed claims against certain individual defendants to continue based on allegations that could support liability outside those immunity protections.

The ruling was not a final determination that those individuals were negligent. It was a decision about which claims could proceed. For survivors, the lesson is that a viable claim against an individual officer or employee does not necessarily establish a viable claim against the organization, and the reverse can also be true.

Delaware’s rules governing governmental immunity, including 10 Del. C. § 4011, can be especially important in claims involving public entities and volunteer fire companies.

How Long Does a Delaware Sex Abuse Lawsuit Take?

The timeline for a sex abuse lawsuit in Delaware varies depending on the complexity of the case, the number of defendants, and whether the case settles or goes to trial. Some cases may reach a settlement within a year, while others could take several years if they go through litigation. Factors such as gathering evidence, depositions, insurance disputes, and institutional resistance can all affect the length of the case.

In older childhood abuse cases, the passage of time can create additional evidentiary challenges. Witnesses may be difficult to locate, documents may have been destroyed, and institutional records may be incomplete. Those problems do not automatically defeat a claim, but they can make litigation more complicated.

Delaware Juvenile Detention Center Sex Abuse Lawsuits

Children held in juvenile detention are among the most vulnerable people in state custody. The staff members who control their daily lives are often the same people they would have to report abuse to. Delaware operates several secure juvenile facilities, including:

• New Castle County Detention Center, Wilmington
• Stevenson House Detention Center, Milford
• Ferris School, Wilmington

These facilities are identified in the Delaware Department of Services for Children, Youth and Their Families’ facility information. Their inclusion here does not mean that abuse has been established at any particular facility.

Claims against the State of Delaware face an obstacle that claims against a private school or church do not: sovereign immunity. The state generally cannot be sued for damages unless immunity has been waived or another legally recognized basis for the claim applies.

House Bill 75, which did not become law in 2026, would have expressly addressed the state’s sovereign immunity for childhood sexual abuse claims. Without that change, a lawyer must carefully evaluate whether a claim against the state, an agency, or individual employees can proceed.

Delaware Sex Abuse Settlements and Verdicts

Below are summaries of verdicts and settlements in Delaware sexual abuse lawsuits. Several are older results, and every case turns on its own facts.

The distinction between a jury verdict and the amount ultimately recovered is important. A jury’s award tells us what the jurors concluded the case was worth based on the evidence presented. That award may later be reduced, settled, or affected by collection problems. We report those developments when they are known, but the original jury award remains meaningful.

• $77,400,000 Diocese Settlement; Approximately $105 Million Total Fund (2011): The Catholic Diocese of Wilmington entered into a major settlement of childhood sexual abuse claims through its Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding. The diocese and related Catholic entities contributed approximately $77.4 million to $77.5 million, while additional contributions from a religious order brought the overall settlement fund to approximately $105 million for about 150 survivors. The cases involved allegations that priests sexually abused children and that church institutions failed to prevent or address the misconduct. Individual compensation varied based on the claims and the settlement process. The total fund should not be treated as though every survivor received the same amount. Source: Bankruptcy counsel’s settlement summary.
• $60,000,000 Jury Verdict (Delaware 2010): A Delaware jury awarded $30 million in compensatory damages and an additional $30 million in punitive damages against former priest Francis DeLuca for sexually abusing a boy who attended St. Elizabeth’s parish in Wilmington during the 1960s. The plaintiff claimed that church officials failed to protect him despite warning signs concerning the priest. The jury also found St. Elizabeth’s parish negligent and assigned $3 million of the compensatory award to the parish. That $3 million was part of the $30 million compensatory verdict, not an additional award. The jury assessed only $1 in punitive damages against the parish. The $60 million figure reflects what the jury awarded against DeLuca, not a verified amount ultimately collected from him. Source: Associated Press reporting on the verdict.
• $41,000,000 Jury Award (Delaware 2007): A Delaware jury awarded a Navy officer $41 million after a default judgment against Reverend Edward Smith, who was accused of repeatedly sexually abusing the plaintiff when he was a student at Archmere Academy in Claymont. The award consisted of $6 million in compensatory damages and $35 million in punitive damages. The plaintiff alleged that Smith abused him hundreds of times during the 1980s. The substantial award reflected the jury’s assessment of the harm and the need for punishment. Collection of the full award was uncertain because it was entered against Smith individually. The plaintiff also pursued claims against institutional defendants, including the separate diocesan settlement described below. Source: Associated Press report.
• $1,500,000 Settlement: The Diocese of Wilmington settled a claim by a survivor who alleged that he was sexually abused as a child by Reverend Edward Carley while Carley was assigned to St. Ann’s Church in Wilmington. The abuse allegedly occurred in the 1950s, and the lawsuit was filed decades later. The case was resolved for $1.5 million before trial. Carley had been accused of abusing other children during his years in ministry. Source: Counsel’s history of the litigation.
• $580,000 Jury Verdict (Delaware 2014): A 17-year-old male employed by defendants Jeffrey Bruette and Brian Kuehn, owners and operators of online retailer Great Stuff Inc., alleged that he suffered severe emotional distress after being supplied with alcohol and drugs and sexually abused on multiple occasions. The jury awarded $80,000 in compensatory damages, consisting of $50,000 against Kuehn and $30,000 against Bruette. The jury also awarded $500,000 in punitive damages, including $200,000 against each individual defendant and $100,000 against Great Stuff Inc. The original jury verdict was therefore $580,000. The trial judge subsequently reduced the punitive damages to $240,000, bringing the total judgment to $320,000. The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the judgment in 2016. The reduction does not change the fact that the jury originally assessed $580,000 in damages. Trial court’s posttrial ruling; Great Stuff, Inc. v. Cotter, Delaware Supreme Court.
• $450,000 Settlement (2008): A Navy officer alleged that he was sexually abused as a child by Reverend Edward Smith at Archmere Academy in Claymont. The Diocese of Wilmington agreed to pay $450,000 to settle the claim against the diocese. This was a separate resolution involving an institutional defendant in the same underlying abuse litigation that produced the $41 million jury award against Smith individually. The two figures represent different defendants and different outcomes, and the $450,000 settlement should not be confused with collection of the $41 million judgment. Source: The News Journal.
• $68,000 Settlement (2004): The Diocese of Wilmington reportedly paid $68,000 to resolve a childhood sexual abuse claim involving former priest Alfred John Lind. The allegations concerned sexual misconduct against boys during his years in ministry. The settlement is an example of an individual clergy abuse resolution before Delaware enacted the 2007 Child Victim’s Act. Source: Diocese of Wilmington abuse records.

What Determines the Settlement Value of a Delaware Sexual Abuse Lawsuit?

There is no reliable average settlement amount that tells you what an individual Delaware sexual abuse case is worth. The verdicts and settlements above show how dramatically outcomes can vary. They also show why a jury award should not be confused with the amount ultimately collected.

In evaluating these cases, several factors have an enormous impact on potential compensation:

• Severity and duration of the abuse: The nature of the sexual misconduct, the survivor’s age, and whether abuse occurred repeatedly over months or years can significantly affect the damages.
• Psychological and emotional injuries: Post-traumatic stress, depression, anxiety, disrupted relationships, lost educational opportunities, and interference with employment can all be important components of damages. Treatment records and expert testimony may help establish these losses.
• Evidence that an institution knew about the danger: Prior complaints, internal investigations, personnel files, and evidence of a cover-up can substantially strengthen a case against a school, church, or other organization.
• Available defendants and insurance: A substantial judgment against an individual with few assets may be difficult to collect. Insurance coverage, institutional assets, and available legal claims often have a major effect on the amount that can realistically be recovered.
• Legal obstacles: Statutes of limitations, sovereign immunity, evidentiary problems, and the availability of punitive damages can dramatically change the outcome.

As plaintiffs’ lawyers, we believe that sexual abuse cases should be valued based on the full harm inflicted on the survivor. The psychological consequences can last for decades, often affecting virtually every part of a person’s life. But settlement value also depends on what can be proved and which defendants can legally be held responsible.

Delaware Sex Abuse News and Updates

Delaware’s sexual abuse litigation continues to develop through new lawsuits, legislation, and court rulings. Below are recent updates on Delaware sex abuse cases, settlements, and legal developments.

Former Wilmington Teacher Convicted in Decades-Old Child Rape Case

October 28, 2026: The Delaware Department of Justice announced that a former teacher at St. Thomas the Apostle School in Wilmington was convicted on October 22 of multiple charges arising from the sexual abuse of a child in 1994 and 1995.

The jury convicted the former teacher of three counts of unlawful sexual intercourse in the first degree, two counts of unlawful sexual contact in the second degree, unlawful sexual penetration in the third degree, and continuous sexual abuse of a child. According to prosecutors, the misconduct occurred while he was teaching at the school, and the abuse came to light during a broader investigation involving allegations against clergy associated with the Diocese of Wilmington.

The case demonstrates how criminal prosecutions for serious childhood sexual offenses can proceed many years after the abuse occurred. The civil statute of limitations is a separate question.

Delaware Child Victims Act Expansion Fails in Final Hours of Session

July 7, 2026: House Bill 75, which supporters called the “Child Victims Act Part 2,” would have removed the remaining statute of limitations barriers for childhood sexual abuse claims in Delaware. The bill would have allowed survivors whose claims expired before 2007 to bring new civil lawsuits, and it would have addressed the state’s sovereign immunity for these claims.

The bill cleared a Senate committee in April. In the final hours of the legislative session, the Senate adopted an amendment that added caps on compensation, separate liability and damage limitations for institutions and abusers, and additional evidentiary requirements for certain older claims. The House sponsor, Rep. Tim Dukes, then struck the bill, saying it was best to start over.

For now, Delaware law is unchanged. Childhood abuse claims that expired before 2007 and were not filed during the 2007 to 2009 window generally remain barred. The Delaware General Assembly lists HB 75 as stricken on July 1, 2026. See also Delaware Public Media’s coverage.

DLA Piper Alleged Rape in Delaware

February 6, 2026: A former DLA Piper law partner is asking a Massachusetts state court to dismiss a rape claim brought by a former associate, arguing that the court lacks jurisdiction because the alleged assault occurred in Delaware, not Massachusetts. The lawsuit includes multiple claims against the firm itself, including hostile work environment, quid pro quo sexual harassment, and retaliation, but the accused individual contends the sexual assault allegation must be analyzed separately and cannot be heard in Massachusetts. He also argues the claim is time-barred under Delaware’s statute of limitations and too vague to proceed.

The plaintiff’s attorneys say it is a little more complicated than that. The alleged assault cannot be viewed in isolation because it arose from a broader pattern of control, coercion, and abuse tied to the defendant’s professional authority over her career in Massachusetts. They argue that the defendant’s influence forced her travel and presence in Delaware, making Massachusetts jurisdiction appropriate, and that issues like statute of limitations and survivor anonymity should not be resolved at the dismissal stage.

These were competing arguments in a pending motion, not findings that the alleged assault occurred or that the claim was legally barred. The dispute is a good reminder of how important filing deadlines and the choice of jurisdiction can be for adult survivors.

Teacher Charged with Grooming Student via Discord App

March 7, 2025: A Christina School District middle school teacher was charged with multiple felonies after investigators alleged that he engaged in inappropriate communications and conduct involving a 13-year-old student through Discord and at school.

According to investigators, the allegations included sexually suggestive messages, inappropriate physical contact, and attempts to communicate privately with the student. Investigators also examined electronic evidence as part of the case. The criminal charges were allegations when the case was reported, and an accusation alone is not proof of guilt.

Here is a rule of thumb that should not be up for debate: No teacher should have private, unmonitored digital access to a student. Ever. Schools need policies that make it difficult for an adult to isolate a child through private messaging and provide a way for students and parents to report inappropriate contact.

Delaware Court Rules on Fire Company’s Immunity in Sex Abuse Lawsuit

March 5, 2025: A Delaware Superior Court judge issued an important ruling in the lawsuit against Belvedere Fire Company arising from the sexual abuse of a 15-year-old junior firefighter.

In Liebal v. Belvedere Fire Company, the court dismissed the fire company based on governmental immunity. It also recognized immunity protections for board members acting in their official capacities. But the judge permitted claims against certain individual defendants to proceed based on allegations that they knew of the danger and failed to act.

That is a meaningful distinction for survivors bringing claims involving public or quasi-public organizations. Institutional immunity may prevent recovery from the organization even where claims against particular officers or employees can proceed. The ruling did not determine that the remaining defendants were ultimately liable.

Lyft Driver Assault Lawsuit Highlights Safety Failures

December 17, 2024: In a lawsuit filed in Delaware Superior Court, a Pennsylvania woman sued Lyft, Inc. and a Delaware resident following a violent assault that occurred while she was working as a Lyft driver.

The plaintiff alleged that on September 26, 2022, while operating a Lyft ride in Dover, Delaware, she picked up the defendant passenger, who was not the authorized rider. During the trip, the man allegedly became aggressive, prompting the plaintiff to attempt to use Lyft’s in-app emergency feature for assistance. The lawsuit claimed the app failed to provide timely emergency support. The plaintiff asserted that after entering a Wawa parking lot, the man violently grabbed her from behind, assaulted her, damaged her vehicle, and fled the scene.

The plaintiff alleged that Lyft’s negligence contributed to her injuries, including physical harm, emotional trauma, and financial losses. Specifically, the complaint challenged Lyft’s training, emergency safety features, and support for drivers facing dangerous situations. The plaintiff also asserted a claim relating to workers’ compensation benefits.

When we first reported on the case, Lyft had filed a motion to dismiss. A subsequent decision changed the procedural posture. On March 4, 2025, the Delaware Superior Court dismissed the plaintiff’s direct negligence count against Lyft because that claim was subject to the parties’ arbitration agreement. The ruling concerned where that claim could be heard. It did not decide whether the underlying assault allegations were true or resolve every claim in the lawsuit.

Residential Treatment Facilities Under Scrutiny

October 18, 2024: Sex abuse lawyers are increasingly turning their attention to abuse and neglect in residential treatment and behavioral health facilities. These lawsuits are fueled by findings from federal investigations, including congressional investigations, that have examined misconduct in facilities funded by public programs like Medicaid and child welfare services.

Several national operators facing that scrutiny have Delaware facilities, including Universal Health Services (UHS), which owns Rockford Center in Newark, and Acadia Healthcare, which operates MeadowWood Behavioral Health Hospital in New Castle. Devereux has also faced abuse lawsuits in other states. Scrutiny of a parent company does not establish that abuse occurred at any particular Delaware facility, but it is a reason to look closely at staffing, supervision, and complaint records.

Fire Company Faces Lawsuit Over Deputy Chief’s Misconduct

August 16, 2024: In a new lawsuit filed in Delaware Superior Court, a family sued the Belvedere Volunteer Fire Company, its Board of Directors, and several individuals over allegations of negligence and misconduct. The lawsuit claimed that the defendants failed to prevent and properly address misconduct by a former deputy chief.

The then 15-year-old plaintiff had joined the Mill Creek Fire Company Junior Membership Program. According to the complaint, a Belvedere deputy chief sexually abused her after meeting her through a joint training exercise. The lawsuit alleged that fire company leadership knew about troubling behavior and previous misconduct yet failed to protect the minor.

The family brought claims for negligent hiring, retention, and supervision, negligent entrustment, and gross negligence, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for the harm caused. The subsequent March 2025 court ruling, discussed above, illustrates how governmental immunity affected the claims against the fire company and its leadership.

Catholic Order Faces Abuse Allegations

June 20, 2024: A woman from Maryland’s Eastern Shore filed a lawsuit against the Oblates of St. Francis de Sales, a Catholic order based in Delaware. The lawsuit alleged that she was sexually abused as a child by a priest in Centreville, Maryland, during the 1960s.

According to the complaint, the priest took advantage of his position at the church to gain access to children and threatened the victim to keep her from reporting the abuse. The plaintiff brought her claims against the Delaware-based religious order under Maryland’s Child Victims Act of 2023. Local reporting described the lawsuit and the allegations.

This case also illustrates an important jurisdictional issue. A lawsuit filed against a Delaware institution does not necessarily involve abuse that occurred in Delaware, and the law governing the claim may depend on where the abuse happened and other choice-of-law considerations.

Maryland AG Expands Clergy Abuse Investigation Involving Wilmington Diocese

March 2, 2024: The Maryland Attorney General expanded its investigation of child sexual abuse involving Catholic institutions beyond the Archdiocese of Baltimore. The office sought testimony from survivors abused at Maryland locations within the Catholic Diocese of Wilmington and the Archdiocese of Washington.

The Diocese of Wilmington includes all of Delaware as well as Cecil County and counties on Maryland’s Eastern Shore. That means some allegations involving clergy assigned to the Wilmington diocese concern misconduct that allegedly occurred in Maryland, where different civil filing rules may apply. Source: Maryland Matters.

Contact Us About Delaware Sex Abuse Lawsuits

If you were the victim of sexual abuse and want to file a sex abuse lawsuit in Delaware, contact us today at 800-553-8082 or reach out to us online. The consultation is free and confidential.

Related: How Delaware’s statute of limitations compares to other states and Uber sex abuse lawsuits.