Colorado Sex Abuse Lawsuits

This post will explain the basics of Colorado sexual abuse lawsuits. We examine how Colorado law defines sexual abuse and assault and when victims of sex abuse can file civil lawsuits and get compensation. We will also analyze the potential settlement value of sex abuse lawsuits in Colorado.

Finally, we will discuss recent efforts by the Colorado state legislature to pass new laws making it easier for victims of child sexual abuse to file lawsuits years after the fact.

Colorado Sex Abuse News and Updates

The legal landscape surrounding sexual assault lawsuits in Colorado is constantly evolving. Changes to Colorado sexual assault laws and new lawsuits all provide information for victims. That’s why we are launching these regular updates—tracking court decisions, new legislation, and major Colorado sex abuse lawsuits that could influence future cases. Whether it’s a high-profile case in Denver, a proposed statute of limitations change, or a ruling from the Colorado Supreme Court, these updates will provide clear insights into the shifting legal landscape.

April 10, 2025: A woman from Englewood, Colorado, has filed a lawsuit against Uber Technologies, Inc. after allegedly being sexually assaulted by an Uber driver during a ride in Arapahoe County on May 11, 2023. According to the complaint, the driver deviated from the intended route, made sexually explicit comments, and physically assaulted the plaintiff by grabbing her inner thigh. The plaintiff had requested the ride using her own Uber account and contends that Uber failed to protect her by not implementing adequate driver screening and safety controls.

This case is part of the expanding multidistrict litigation (MDL No. 3084) centralized in the Northern District of California, which now includes hundreds of similar claims across the United States. The plaintiff joins other survivors in alleging negligence, negligent hiring and supervision, and breach of Uber’s duty to provide safe transportation. The suit seeks compensatory and punitive damages and demands a jury trial.

And why file this case in California when the assault occurred in Colorado? Because the federal court system has consolidated all Uber sexual assault cases into a single multidistrict litigation docket in the Northern District of California. This centralized MDL structure promotes consistency in rulings, streamlines discovery, and allows plaintiffs nationwide to proceed together against a California-based corporation.

February 15, 2025: In a new lawsuit filed Wednesday, a former employee of Denver Public Schools (DPS) has accused the district of fostering a hostile work environment and retaliating against her after she reported being sexually harassed and assaulted by her supervisor. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, alleges that DPS failed to protect the plaintiff, instead siding with the alleged perpetrator, a well-known athletic director, and ultimately forcing her to resign.

According to the complaint, the plaintiff, who worked as an Athletic Assistant at Denver South High School, was sexually harassed and groped by her direct supervisor during a routine work task in June 2023. The supervisor allegedly made inappropriate comments about her appearance, touched her without consent, and later made additional sexualized remarks. When she reported the incident to school administrators, DPS placed the supervisor on paid administrative leave but failed to shield the plaintiff from workplace hostility.

The lawsuit claims that other employees openly speculated about the allegations, expressed support for the supervisor, and created an environment where the plaintiff felt ostracized. Despite her requests, DPS denied her paid leave during the investigation, while the accused was allowed to remain on paid leave. Feeling unsafe and unsupported, the plaintiff resigned in July 2023, arguing that her resignation amounted to a constructive discharge.

December 1, 2024: A federal judge denied a motion seeking to dismiss a lawsuit accusing the U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee of negligently failing to protect an athlete from sexual abuse at its Colorado Springs training facility. The lawsuit was filed by a Paralympic athlete who claims that he was sexually assaulted by another athlete at the Colorado Springs facility while he was staying there training. The defense had sought to dismiss the case by arguing that the plaintiff was not an invitee at the facility under Colorado law. The judge flatly rejected that argument, however, allowing the case to move forward.

September 3, 2024: A former teacher and 2 para-educators are suing the Laradon School in Denver for negligently failing to protect them from sexual abuse by a student. The lawsuit claims that the Laradon School falsely represented that it did not accept students with sexually aggressive behaviors. The plaintiffs assert that they were repeatedly sexually assaulted by a female student with known sexual aggression.

July 22, 2024:  A 52-year-old man has been charged with one count of Repeated Sexual Assault of a Child for incidents that allegedly occurred between September 2002 and December 2003.

The charge is part of the Clergy and Faith Leader Abuse Initiative and stems from a report made to this initiative. At the time, the accused was a youth pastor at Faith Reformed Church in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin. He is accused of assaulting a victim in his vehicle while driving the victim home.

During an interview with special agents, the accused admitted to having an “inappropriate” relationship with a girl in the youth group. The victim had not reported the assault until contacting the Clergy and Faith Leader Abuse Initiative.

May 3, 2024: A proposal to remove the statute of limitations for filing civil claims related to child sexual abuse failed in the Colorado Senate after no Republicans voted in favor of it.

The resolution, which would have allowed voters to decide on giving the legislature the authority to pass such legislation, needed one more vote to advance but fell short due to the Democrats’ lack of a supermajority.

The proposal was a response to a Colorado Supreme Court ruling we discuss below that declared a 2021 repeal of the statute of limitations unconstitutional because it applied retroactively. Senate Republicans argued that the resolution would undermine legal certainty and due process, despite acknowledging the importance of protecting children from abuse. With the resolution’s defeat, similar measures will not appear on the November ballot.

April 23, 2024: This week, a resolution proposing a retrospective law related to sex abuse lawsuits is facing uncertainty as Senate Democrats seek a single Republican vote necessary for its progression. Senate Concurrent Resolution 1, introduced on January 31 and narrowly passed in its only committee on February 7 by a 3-2 vote, has been stalled in the Senate awaiting debate for over two months due to the Democrats lacking a 24-member supermajority. If passed, the resolution would appear on the ballot. It needs 24 votes to proceed.

If this new Colorado sex abuse statute of limitations law fails, remember that Senator Mark Baisley of Woodland Park co-sponsored the bill but retracted his support. What does that tell you?

After receiving bipartisan support in 2021, the Colorado Supreme Court deemed the law unconstitutional nearly a year ago, prompting the current resolution. In contrast to 2021’s broad support, this year’s discussions have been markedly partisan.  How is this a partisan issue?

April 3, 2024:  In an impassioned editorial, Jill Brogdon, a survivor of sex trafficking and child sexual abuse, advocates for the passage of Senate Concurrent Resolution 1 (SCR 1) in Colorado. This resolution seeks to eliminate the statute of limitations for civil lawsuits brought against perpetrators of child sexual abuse. Drawing from her own harrowing experiences of abuse by a teacher in the Denver Public Schools during the 1970s, Brogdon emphasizes the lifelong trauma survivors endure and the obstacles they face in seeking justice.

Brogdon criticizes the current legal system that, in her view, has historically protected abusers by imposing time constraints that prevent survivors from filing lawsuits. She points out the discrepancy between survivors’ need for justice and the legal system’s failure to provide it, highlighting a recent disappointment when Colorado’s Supreme Court overturned a law allowing victims a three-year window to sue their abusers.

The editorial outlines the proposed constitutional amendment that would allow survivors to pursue legal action regardless of when the abuse occurred. It challenges the arguments of some legislators who fear the resolution would lead to business closures and an overwhelmed court system. Brogdon counters these claims with evidence from other states where similar laws have been enacted without such consequences.

By sharing her story and advocating for SCR 1, Brogdon calls for a systemic change that shifts the burden of proof to the institutions that have been complicit in abuse. She argues that the amendment is not just about retribution but about creating a legal framework that acknowledges and addresses the trauma of survivors, offering them a path to closure and systemic reform.

January 16, 2024: A group of Colorado legislators is formally proposing an amendment to the state constitution to circumvent a ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court last year, which struck down the Colorado Child Sexual Abuse Accountability Act of 2021 (the “CSAAA”). The CSAAA would have enabled victims of child sex abuse that occurred decades ago to file civil lawsuits without any statute of limitations restrictions. Last summer, however, the state’s high court invalidated the law because it violated the state constitution. Now the legislature is considering the possibility of amending the state constitution to allow new retroactive laws to be enacted when they involve child sexual abuse claims.

September 22, 2023: The Colorado legislature is debating amending the state constitution to allow a child sex abuse revival law to be passed. The amendment would directly address the ruling by the state Supreme Court striking down a law passed in 2021 that would have allowed child sex abuse victims to sue for abuse that occurred years in the past.

June 7, 2023: The Colorado Supreme Court struck down a new law passed by the legislature that allowed victims of child sexual abuse to file civil lawsuits for incidents of abuse dating back as far as the 1960s. The state’s high court ruled that the law (the Colorado Child Sexual Abuse Accountability Act of 2021) violated the state constitution, which strictly prohibits legislation that applies retroactively in a way that impacts certain property rights.

---

Definition of Sexual Abuse in Colorado

In Colorado, sexual assault or sexual abuse is defined as any sexual touching or contact made without the other person’s consent and for the purpose of sexual gratification. From a civil justice standpoint, these acts are often referred to as sexual battery. This legal framework is intentionally broad and inclusive—covering everything from inappropriate groping to forcible rape—because the law recognizes that all forms of non-consensual sexual contact are violations of a person’s dignity, safety, and autonomy.

Survivors of sexual abuse in Colorado have the right to pursue justice in both the criminal and civil courts. Civil claims can help victims seek compensation for the deep emotional, psychological, and physical trauma they’ve endured—especially when criminal prosecution fails or does not lead to conviction.

Two essential legal elements must be present to establish a case of sexual abuse in Colorado:

• Intentional Sexual Contact: The touching must be done purposefully and with a sexual motive. For example, a person brushing against someone in a crowded space isn’t automatically committing sexual abuse. But if that contact is deliberate and done for sexual gratification, it crosses the line into unlawful conduct.
• Lack of Consent: Consent must be mutual and freely given. Any sexual contact that occurs without this mutual agreement qualifies as abuse. Importantly, Colorado law recognizes that certain individuals—especially minors—cannot legally provide consent.

Under Colorado Revised Statutes § 18-3-402, any sexual contact with a person under the age of 18 is legally non-consensual. That means if a 25-year-old adult engages in sexual activity with a 16-year-old—even if the teen appears willing or initiates the encounter—that conduct is considered sexual assault under the law. The statute makes it clear: minors lack the legal capacity to consent.

This legal protection is especially critical in civil litigation, where victims often face powerful institutions and individuals who try to deny responsibility or hide behind technicalities. The civil justice system gives survivors a voice—and a path to real accountability—by allowing them to expose misconduct, pursue damages, and protect others from suffering the same harm.

If you or a loved one was sexually abused in Colorado—regardless of when it happened—you may have legal options. State law has evolved to better support survivors, including changes to the statute of limitations. Speaking with a qualified Colorado sexual abuse attorney can help you understand your rights and next steps.

When Can Victims of Abuse File Lawsuits?

In Colorado, sexual abuse or assault is both a crime and a civil wrong or “tort” (the tort version is sometimes referred to as “sexual battery”). This means sexual abuse victims can pursue criminal charges and/or file a civil lawsuit to seek financial compensation. Any individual who has suffered from sexual abuse or assault has the right to pursue either or both options, although prosecuting the criminal charges is not necessarily within their control.

Victims of sexual abuse can pursue a civil lawsuit regardless of whether the individual who committed the abuse was ever criminally charged or convicted. In fact, victims can bring a civil lawsuit even if they never reported the abuse to the police and even if they never told anyone about it.

The burden of proof required to establish sexual battery in a civil case is notably lighter compared to that in a criminal trial. This means that it is much easier for a plaintiff in a civil lawsuit to demonstrate the occurrence of sexual abuse or assault. So even if an offender evades criminal prosecution, they can still be held liable in a civil court of law.

Colorado Statute of Limitations for Sex Abuse Lawsuits

Over the last few years lawmakers in Colorado have been battling to change existing laws to allow victims of child sexual abuse to file civil lawsuits even years after the abuse occurred. In 2021, the state legislature passed a new law that created a 3 year “look back” window allowing child sex abuse victims to file civil lawsuits for abuse dating back as early as the 1960s.

The Colorado Supreme Court struck that law down, however, on the grounds that it violated the state constitution. In response, lawmakers in Colorado are now considering a state constitutional amendment aimed at enabling survivors of childhood sexual assault to sue for older claims faces unfortunate opposition, complicating its advancement in the Senate. This amendment would essentially circumvent the ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court declaring the lookback law unconstitutional.

The proposed constitutional amendment would allow retrospective legislation for cases involving child predators.  Although difficult to accomplish, this amendment to Colorado’s constitution would enable lawmakers to give victims who often disclose their abuse decades later, to seek justice against perpetrators and the institutions that enabled the abuse.

However, achieving the necessary two-thirds legislative support is challenging, especially in the Senate, where Democrats lack the requisite supermajority. Generously, we can say opposition stems from concerns about the potential financial impact on public and private institutions for acts committed in the distant past that could lead to unfair financial burdens on organizations for the misdeeds of past leaders. Cynics would say that lobbyist money has changed too many votes.

No SOL For Child Sex Abuse Occurring 2022 or Later

Although the Colorado Supreme Court struck down the part of the 2021 law that created a lookback period for past claims, the Court upheld the part of the law that completely lifted the statute of limitations for child sex abuse lawsuits based on abuse occurring after January 1, 2022. So as of that date, Colorado law allows civil actions based on sexual misconduct to be commenced at any time without limitation, applying to both new causes of action and those for which the statute of limitations had not yet expired by that date.

To better understand it, let’s look at a timeline of the evolution of the Colorado sex abuse statute of limitations:

Holding Organizations and Institutions Liable in Colorado Sex Abuse Lawsuits

In a sex abuse lawsuit, the individual who committed the sexual abuse or assault will always have direct liability and can be named as a defendant. The only problem with suing the abuser is that unless they are rich, they probably don’t have the financial resources to pay a big settlement or verdict. For that reason alone, suing the individual abuser is often a pointless endeavor.

The way to get compensation in a sex abuse lawsuit is to sue a third-party organization like a school, church, or company. Schools, churches, and other institutional third parties can be held liable in sex abuse lawsuits based on negligence. If the third party negligently failed to prevent the abuse (or covered it up), they can be held liable. Below are some common examples of the types of negligence claims that can be asserted against third-party defendants in sex abuse cases:

• Failing to screen employees for sexual abuse history.
• Failing to investigate complaints about sexual misconduct by an employee and take appropriate action.
• Concealing or ignoring evidence of sexual misconduct by employees.

Clergy Abuse Lawsuits in Colorado

Clergy abuse lawsuits in Colorado have gained significant attention in recent years, reflecting the broader national and global scrutiny of sexual misconduct within religious institutions. Our culture will not put up with what it did just decades ago.

In Colorado, these lawsuits often involve claims against Catholic dioceses and other religious organizations, with allegations spanning several decades. Many cases have surfaced through survivors’ reports and investigative efforts, leading to legal actions to seek justice and financial compensation for the victims. The state’s legal system has been actively addressing these claims, contributing to the ongoing efforts to hold perpetrators accountable and support survivors.

A notable aspect of clergy abuse lawsuits in Colorado is the involvement of the state’s legislative and legal framework in facilitating these cases. The legislature has been trying to help, as we talk about above in the statute of limitations discussion above that have been somewhat destroyed by the Colorado Supreme Court.  But there are other things that are being done to try to help, including the establishment of initiatives like the Colorado Attorney General’s Special Master Program to provide a structured avenue for victims to report abuse and pursue settlements outside the traditional court system, which can make sense for some victims in some situations.

The impact of clergy abuse lawsuits in Colorado extends beyond individual settlements and verdicts, influencing broader societal and institutional reforms. These legal actions have prompted religious organizations to reevaluate their policies and practices regarding sexual abuse prevention and response. Increased transparency, mandatory reporting, and enhanced protective measures for children and vulnerable individuals are some of the changes driven by these lawsuits. Moreover, the public awareness generated by these cases has contributed to a cultural shift towards zero tolerance for sexual abuse and greater support for survivors, fostering a safer and more accountable environment within religious communities and beyond.

Detention Center Sex Abuse Lawsuits

Colorado Sex Abuse Settlements and Verdicts

Below are examples of settlement amounts and verdicts in sex abuse lawsuits within Colorado. The information provided here offers insights into potential settlement amounts in sexual assault and abuse claims based on past cases. These examples are intended to help you better understand the possible outcomes in similar lawsuits. They cannot help you calculate your specific compensation payout. Each case is unique, with various factors influencing the final amounts awarded. So these are instructive, but take them with a grain of salt in terms of calculating value in a specific claim.

• $608,970 Verdict: The plaintiff had been working for the defendant (a veterinarian) at his office and horse farm. At age 15, she had trouble at home, and she came to live with the defendant at his house. After she moved in, the defendant got drunk one night and sexually assaulted her, at which point the plaintiff moved out.  The defendant offered to perform the surgery if the plaintiff would work off the charges after school. The defendant divorced his wife, told the plaintiff if she moved back in with him, she would inherit his ranch. The plaintiff and her mother moved in with the defendant, took care of his home, and his adult autistic son. When the plaintiff started seeing a boyfriend, the defendant quadrupled the amount of money she owed to him and threatened to put down one of the horses she looked after, starving the horse until she agreed to talk to him.
• $1,400,000 Verdict: The plaintiff, a 9-year-old male, suffered sexual abuse and exploitation at the hands of the defendant, a County Court Appointed Special Advocate, during a neglect case that resulted in the boy being placed outside the home of his parents. It was alleged that the defendant purposefully sought out his position as a volunteer Special Advocate in order to gain access to vulnerable children. The sex abuse lawsuit was filed against the county for negligent hiring and supervising.
• $4,000,000 Settlement: A group of twenty-three former students claimed they endured sexual abuse committed by Brother William Mueller, a teacher and cleric, at a Catholic school in Pueblo, Colorado. In nearly all the cases, the molestation was allegedly committed in the school band room after Mueller used chemicals to render the students unconscious.  Each individual claimant received around $172,000 under the settlement.
• $210,000 Verdict: A four-year-old male was sexually molested in a restroom at a McDonald’s outside Denver by one of the McDonald’s employees, who was on probation for a similar offense. The Denver sexul assault lawsuit was apparently complicated by the fact that the worker was mentally retarded and was employed as part of the defendant’s program to provide jobs for persons with disabilities.  We all appreciate the cause, but this is not a person who should have had access to children. It is surprising the verdict was so low.
• $295,000 Verdict: The plaintiff suffered emotional distress, depression, and anxiety as a result of sexual molestation she allegedly experienced while attending a child care center operated by the defendant. A janitor employed by the defendant reportedly sat her on his lap, put his hands under her shirt, and rubbed her nipples, breasts, and chest on multiple occasions while the plaintiff was between six and nine years old. The lawsuit alleged that the day care was negligent in hiring and supervising the janitor and allowing him access to children.
• $4,200,000 Settlement: The plaintiff, an 18-year-old female with mental disabilities, alleged that she was sexually assaulted by a 15-year-old male at a school operated by the defendant school district. The minor male was assigned by the defendant district to be the plaintiff’s field trainer and was directed to spend one-on-one time with her and escort her around campus. The plaintiff contended that the defendant failed to provide adequate supervision for the plaintiff, that it negligently allowed minor students to assist in its program for disabled students without proper screening or supervision, that it failed to ensure the safety of the students entrusted to its care, and that its negligence resulted in the sexual abuse of the plaintiff.
• $149,000 Settlement: The plaintiff was allegedly sexually assaulted at a Taco Bell restaurant. The sexual assault was committed by a Taco Bell employee. The plaintiff contended that the defendant negligently hired and failed to supervise the third-named defendant.

Key Factors in Calculating Settlements and Jury Payouts in Colorado Sex Abuse Lawsuits

When determining settlement amounts and jury verdicts in Colorado sexual abuse lawsuits, there are hundreds of factors to consider.  But several key factors come up over and over that drive final compensation awarded to survivors:

1. Severity of the Abuse and Resulting Harm

The most critical factor in a Colorado sexual assault and child abuse lawsuit case is the severity and duration of the abuse. Cases involving prolonged abuse, multiple incidents, or physical injuries will lead to higher settlement compensation, all things being equal.  Psychological harm, such as PTSD, anxiety, or depression, also plays a significant role in determining damages. A jury will be more sympathetic to more compensation if medical and psychological experts can document long-term trauma.

2. Age of the Victim and Vulnerability

Younger victims often receive higher settlement payouts due to their increased vulnerability and the long-lasting effects of trauma. Courts also consider whether the abuser was in a position of authority, such as a coach, teacher, or clergy member, which can increase liability and punitive damages.

3. Strength of Evidence and Witness Testimony

A well-documented case with strong witness testimony and corroborating evidence—such as medical records, police reports, or admissions from the perpetrator—generally leads to a higher sexual abuse lawsuit payout. The presence of multiple victims or past allegations against the abuser or institution will potentially anger the jury and that further strengthens a claim.

4. Statute of Limitations Considerations

While Colorado has expanded the civil statute of limitations for child sex abuse victims, some claims may still face legal challenges regarding timing. Understanding the Colorado sexual assault statute of limitations is critical in determining whether a claim can proceed. Cases within the legally permitted window are stronger and less likely to face dismissal.  The best lawsuits are clearly within the civil statute of limitations for child sex abuse claims.

5. Location and Jury Bias

Where the lawsuit is filed can significantly impact the payout. In more urban areas like Denver, jurors may be more sympathetic to survivors, leading to higher jury verdicts in sexual abuse lawsuits. Studies have shown that Denver sexual abuse lawsuits tend to yield larger awards compared to cases tried in rural areas, where juries may be more conservative. Plaintiffs filing a sexual abuse lawsuit in Denver or Boulder will find a more favorable legal climate than those in smaller counties. That said, our lawyer always say that a good sex abuse lawsuit is a strong claim anywhere where you can get a jury of Americans.

6. Defendant’s Ability to Pay

Sadly, the last factor is actually the biggest factor. You need a deep pocket to pay a sex abuse settlement amount or all the effort is really in vain. The financial resources of the defendant play a major role—usually the essential role—in determining a settlement. Cases involving large institutions—such as schools, churches, or corporations—will result in higher sexual abuse lawsuit settlements because these entities have plenty of insurance coverage and assets. On the other hand, claims against individual abusers without substantial financial resources may lead to lower or no compensation recoveries.

Contact Us About Colorado Sex Abuse Lawsuits

If you were the victim of sexual abuse and want to file a sex abuse lawsuit in Colorado contact us today at 800-553-8082 or contact us online.