A verdicts and settlements database found that the median plaintiff’s verdict award for motor vehicle cases that involved back injuries is $212,500. For all car, truck, and motorcycle accident injury cases in the database that earned a plaintiff’s verdict, the median award is $300,000.
Sample Verdicts and Settlements in Back Injury Cases 2017-2020
Below are sample back injury verdicts. Most are in the Baltimore-Washington area in 2017-2020. But this is a popular page so as we have updated it, we have expanded the scope.
- March 2020 – New York $25,000 Verdict: While stopped near an intersection, the plaintiff’s van was struck by the van behind it. He initially refused to seek medical attention but visited his primary care physician two days later. He claimed that he suffered a C-4-C-5 herniation, and bulges to his L1-L2, L2-L3, and L4-L5 discs. The plaintiff also suffered multiple tears on his right dominant shoulder. He underwent physical therapy courses over a week after his diagnosis. He underwent surgery on his right shoulder. The plaintiff now experiences difficulties with basic activities as a result. His physician opined that he would need surgery on his spine. The jury awarded the plaintiff $25,000 in damages.
- February 2020 – Texas $33,525 Verdict: While the plaintiff driving eastward, the southward traveling defendant struck his vehicle after stopping at a stop sign. His vehicle landed into a yard. Two days later, he visited an emergency room, where he was diagnosed with soft-tissue back pain and a left-hand hematoma. He ultimately suffered herniations to his C2-3, C3-4, C4-5, C5-6, C6-7, L2-3, L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1. He underwent physical therapy with a chiropractor. The plaintiff also underwent pain management, consisting of epidural steroid injections. He also underwent lumbar and cervical injections. The plaintiff noted that he continued to experience lower back pain if he sat for extended periods. The jury awarded the plaintiff $33,525.
- February 2020 – Texas $22,890 Verdict: In this case, the plaintiff struck the defendant’s vehicle as the defendant making a left turn. He sustained disc protrusions at C5-6 and L3-4 and soft-tissue neck, back, and left shoulder injuries. He underwent over thirty physical therapy and chiropractic sessions within three months. The plaintiff can no longer ski or surf as a result. The jury awarded the plaintiff, $22,890, which was reduced to $18,312 based on comparative negligence.
- February 2020 – Virginia $1,980,000 Settlement: While a passenger in a vehicle went off-road and struck an illegally parked tractor-trailer, the plaintiff suffered multiple injuries. They consisted of fractures to his L2, sternum, ankle, and ribs. So clearly this is more than a back injury case, but an L2 fracture is a serious injury. The case settled for $1,980,000.
- January 2020 – Maryland $205,392 Verdict: While driving on Shady Grove Road in Gaithersburg, the plaintiff’s vehicle was rear-ended by a motorist who was asleep at the wheel. In addition to knee injuries, the plaintiff suffered soft-tissue back and neck injuries. He underwent physical therapy and knee surgery. The Montgomery County jury awarded the plaintiff $205,392.
- December 2019 – Maryland $200,000 Verdict: The plaintiff experienced a side-swipe collision to her vehicle as she entered an intersection. She suffered a herniated C-56 disc and the aggravation of her formerly asymptomatic lumbar spinal cyst. Two months later, she underwent fusion surgery and an anterior cervical discectomy. The plaintiff then underwent physical therapy and pain management. Her experts testified that the collision caused her disc herniation and aggravated cyst. The plaintiff also claimed that is unable to return to work. The defense counsel contended that she was physically capable of working. Their orthopedics expert testified that her herniation also pre-existed the collision. The Frederick County jury awarded $200,000.
- December 2019 – Maryland $120,429 Verdict: The plaintiff, after coming to a stop behind a school bus, was rear-ended by the defendant. In addition to soft-tissue shoulder, neck, and rib injuries, the plaintiff had his pre-existing degenerative changes in the spine aggravated. He experienced chronic radicular pain in his lumbar region. He underwent physical therapy courses and steroid injections for treatment. His soft-tissue injuries resolved, but his lower back injuries did not. The plaintiff’s physiatrist testified that the collision caused his spinal injuries, which necessitate future surgery including a laminectomy fusion surgery to his lumbar region. The Montgomery County jury awarded the plaintiff $120,429 in damages.
- November 2019 – Maryland $7,483,254 Verdict: While at a gas station, the plaintiff’s vehicle was struck at the side by an electrician’s van. The plaintiff also testified that he saw the van drive away from the gas pump and hit his vehicle’s driver-side door. An MRI revealed an L5-S1 herniation and aggravation of a degenerative disc disease at C3-4 and C5-6. The plaintiff also suffered from post-traumatic cervical radiculopathy. After undergoing two years of physical therapy and pain management, his doctors recommended a discectomy and two-level fusion surgery, which were unsuccessful. Two years later, he had revision spinal surgery to his lumbar region. It was not successful, and he was now permanently impaired. He can no longer work. A Prince George’s County jury awarded $7,483,253.89.
- January 2019 – Maryland $14,700 Verdict: Plaintiff was driving his vehicle toward an intersection when a vehicle driven by the defendant attempted to make a left turn in front of his vehicle. The vehicles collided, and the plaintiff claimed he sustained injuries to his back, causing continued pain and discomfort. The defendant admitted liability, but the case went to trial on causation and damages. The jury awarded $14,780 in damages.
- October 2018 – Maryland $53,883 Verdict: Plaintiff, a UPS driver, was driving a UPS tractor-trailer on I-95 just north of Baltimore when the defendant rear-ended him. Plaintiff allegedly sustains injuries to the middle and upper back and sought compensation for pain and suffering, medical expenses, and lost wages. The case went to trial in Montgomery County and the jury awarded $53k.
- January 2018 – Maryland $28,600 Verdict: Plaintiff was proceeding through the intersection of Fulton Ave and Pressman Street in Baltimore when another vehicle ran a red light and hit her. The driver of the other vehicle fled the scene and was never identified. Plaintiff sued her insurer, Allstate, for UIM benefits and was awarded $28k.
- April 2017 – Maryland $60,000 Verdict: Plaintiff was a 34-year woman who is rear-ended on an interstate. She herniated a disc in her neck and had radiculopathy, which means the disc was hitting a nerve root. The jury in relatively rural Westminster awarded $60,000.
Some Older Verdicts
- December 2015 – Maryland $130,000 Verdict: Plaintiff, a retired 68-year-old male, came to a stop on the highway and was rear-ended allegedly resulting in a herniated disc in his cervical spine. The defendant alleged that Plaintiff contributed to the accident by coming to a very sudden and unnecessary stop. The jury in Prince George’s County found in favor of the Plaintiff and awarded damages of $130,000 for his back injuries which he claimed would have a permanent impact on his life.
- June 2015 – Maryland $18,000 Verdict: Plaintiff suffered lumbar disc herniation, mental anguish, and soft tissue neck injuries from a rear-end collision. The defendant disputed liability and contested the nature and extent of the plaintiff’s claimed injuries. A Prince George’s County jury awarded $18,000 in damages. This is a tough loss in a venue that has been favorable to plaintiffs historically.
- June 2014, Maryland: $113,555 Verdict: A local marketing director was walking to a table at the outdoor seating patio of J. Paul’s Harbor Place restaurant in downtown Baltimore when she stepped into an uncovered gutter, tripped and fell. She was taken by ambulance to a local emergency room where she was diagnosed with a fractured ankle and a lumbar disc herniation. The ankle was set and cast and removed six weeks later. Her back injuries required several months of physical therapy and chiropractic treatment. She sued the restaurant owners for negligence, claiming the tables and chairs were placed too close to the open gutter. Defendants argued the gutter was clearly marked, and that Plaintiff had visited the restaurant before and was familiar with the restaurant floor plan. A Baltimore City jury rendered a verdict in favor of Plaintiff for $113,555.
- April 2014, Maryland: $412,738 Verdict: A 30-year-old woman was a passenger in her friend’s vehicle traveling northbound on Ritchie Highway in Anne Arundel County. Her friend attempted to make a left turn across the southbound lanes of traffic when the car was broadsided by a southbound vehicle traveling about 50 mph. The woman was transported by ambulance to a local hospital where she was diagnosed with three fractured ribs, body bruising, and neck and back injuries. Her injuries required treatment from an orthopedist, physical therapist, and chiropractor. She sued her friend for negligence, for failing to yield the right-of-way to oncoming traffic, and for failing to keep a proper lookout. Defendant stipulated liability in exchange for a verdict cap at $100,000 (her insurance policy limits), but argued the extent of the Plaintiff’s injuries, claiming Plaintiff’s back and neck treatment was excessive and unnecessary. An Anne Arundel County jury found in favor of the Plaintiff for $412,737.77, which was reduced to the stipulated sum of $100,000.
- April 2014, District of Columbia: $15,285 Verdict: A 63-year-old man was diagnosed with soft tissue cervical and lumbar injuries, as well as aggravation of a pre-existing degenerative disc disease after being rear-ended at an intersection and. The driver of the vehicle that struck him was uninsured, so the man sued his uninsured motorist carrier, State Farm. Plaintiff claimed the driver failed to keep a proper lookout and failed to maintain an appropriate distance between the vehicles. While State Farm did not dispute the at-fault driver, they did dispute the extent of the Plaintiff’s injuries. State Farm claimed the Plaintiff was not seriously injured, and any complaints were related to the pre-existing degenerative disc disease. A District of Columbia jury found in favor of Plaintiff and awarded him $15,285.40.
- March 2014, Maryland: $61,628 Verdict: A retired insurance executive was driving through the intersection of Magruder and Newburgh Roads in Catonsville when he was involved in a car accident when a driver failed to stop for a stop sign. He sought medical treatment from his primary care physician shortly thereafter with complaints of lower back pain and headaches. He received physical therapy for aggravation of a prior lumbar fusion and diagnosed with post-concussive syndrome. He sued the driver for negligent operation of her vehicle. Defendant admitted liability but disputed the extent of Plaintiff’s back injuries. The arguments were presented in a Baltimore County Circuit Court where a jury rendered a $61,628.35 verdict.
- January 2014; Maryland: $28,817 Verdict: A 69-year-old woman was riding in the backseat of her son’s vehicle in Prince George’s County when they were rear-ended by a minivan that swerved into their lane to avoid colliding with a parked vehicle. She was taken by ambulance to a local emergency room where she was treated for headaches, lower back pain, and left knee pain. She visited an orthopedist the following month where MRIs revealed a tear of the left knee and a slipped vertebrae. Her injuries required multiple physical therapy sessions and, more importantly, the permanent use of a cane to walk. She sued the minivan driver for negligence, claiming he failed to keep a proper lookout. Defendant admitted liability and a Prince George’s County jury awarded Plaintiff $28,816.59 Not sure what happened here but the jury obviously did not believe the victim.
Get more back injury settlements and verdicts.
Learning More About the Value of Your Case
Statistics and sample settlements and jury verdicts get you started in understanding the range of value for your case. But they are just the beginning of the analysis. Statistics and prior cases cannot predict the value of your case. There are just too many factors in the mix to isolate the ones that led those results to go as they did. There is just no formula or metric to figure out the value of an individual claim. Still, these example verdicts and settlements are not without value. They are one tool of many at your disposal to help narrow the likely range trial range of your case which is ultimately the number the insurance companies will use to calculate your settlement value.
If you want to learn more about your case, you can get a free online case evaluation or call me at 800-553-8082.